"They certainly could have terminated the contract...and re-hedged, but they elected not to, because they would have had to pay the estate money, and so they're trying to have their cake and eat it too."

© 2026 GlobalCapital, Derivia Intelligence Limited, company number 15235970, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX. Part of the Delinian group. All rights reserved.

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement | Event Participant Terms & Conditions

"They certainly could have terminated the contract...and re-hedged, but they elected not to, because they would have had to pay the estate money, and so they're trying to have their cake and eat it too."

--Robert Lemons, partner at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, counsel for Lehman Brothers, on why he thinks swap counterparties are unjustified in ceasing payments to the bankrupt firm.

Unlock this article.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this article:

Request demo or Login
  • 4,000 annual insights
  • 700+ notes and long-form analyses
  • 4 capital markets databases
  • Daily newsletters across markets and asset classes
  • 2 weekly podcasts

Related articles

Gift this article