The UK should steer clear of dual-class rush

© 2025 GlobalCapital, Derivia Intelligence Limited, company number 15235970, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX. Part of the Delinian group. All rights reserved.

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement | Event Participant Terms & Conditions

The UK should steer clear of dual-class rush

Lyft_PA_230x150
Parking in front of the Atlantic Terminal Mall in Downtown Brooklyn in New York is designated as a Lyft pick-up and drop-off location, seen on Saturday, March 2, 2019. The IPO for the ride-sharing service is reported to be as close as this month. (ÂPhoto by Richard B. Levine) | Richard B. Levine/SIPA USA/PA Images

Lyft, the US ride sharing app, has hit the gas on its Nasdaq IPO this week, which promises to be the largest technology listing in New York since Alibaba floated in 2014. The deal is a fee bonanza for Lyft’s banks but it has also reignited the debate about dual class share structures. The LSE and UK regulators should maintain corporate governance standards, and resist competitive pressures to follow New York, Hong Kong and Singapore by allowing them.

Unlock this article.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this article:

Request demo or Login
  • 4,000 annual insights
  • 700+ notes and long-form analyses
  • 4 capital markets databases
  • Daily newsletters across markets and asset classes
  • 2 weekly podcasts
Gift this article