Watermark
Go to Asia edition

AB InBev has few options after pulling Asian IPO

Anheuser-Busch InBev’s decision to pull the $9.8bn IPO of its Asian business is a classic example of a seller not listening to the views of investors when it comes to valuation.

  • By Aidan Gregory
  • 18 Jul 2019

Buyers shunned the IPO because they thought the $54.2bn-$63.7bn valuation AB InBev was seeking for the division was far too expensive.

Despite equity markets being at, or near, all-time highs, there have been outflows from funds. Sellers need to understand that investors do not think that this rally ...

Please take a trial or subscribe to access this content.

Contact our subscriptions team to discuss your access: subs@globalcapital.com

Or sign up for a trial to gain full access to the entire site for a limited period.

Free Trial
Log in

Corporate access

To discuss GlobalCapital access for your entire department or company please contact our subscriptions sales team at: subs@globalcapital.com or find out more online here.

Bond Comments

All International Bonds

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
View full table
For detailed analysis: Dealogic
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 JPMorgan 260,621.66 1168 8.50%
2 Citi 237,013.77 993 7.73%
3 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 202,064.03 831 6.59%
4 Barclays 188,016.56 770 6.13%
5 Goldman Sachs 146,834.39 610 4.79%

Bookrunners of All Syndicated Loans EMEA

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
View full table
For detailed analysis: Dealogic
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 BNP Paribas 31,872.91 136 7.74%
2 Credit Agricole CIB 27,567.28 117 6.69%
3 JPMorgan 23,570.89 63 5.72%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 23,072.58 63 5.60%
5 UniCredit 20,250.58 112 4.91%

Bookrunners of all EMEA ECM Issuance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
View full table
For detailed analysis: Dealogic
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 JPMorgan 8,331.89 50 10.24%
2 Morgan Stanley 7,744.92 38 9.52%
3 Goldman Sachs 7,137.50 38 8.77%
4 Citi 5,856.44 44 7.20%
5 UBS 4,823.67 25 5.93%