Treasury Futures Mismatch Causes Supply Squeeze

The number of outstanding five-year Treasury futures expiring at the end of the month has ballooned, far surpassing the eligible securities available to fulfill these contracts.

  • 17 Dec 2004
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

The number of outstanding five-year Treasury futures expiring at the end of the month has ballooned, far surpassing the eligible securities available to fulfill these contracts. The mismatch is causing the price of these futures to rise dramatically as counterparties scramble to avoid not having the Feb '09s to deliver.

The number of outstanding December futures contracts for Feb. '09 Treasuries is unusually high at 215,000 versus the 50,000 more typical for December. However, only $17 billion of the Feb. '09 Treasury issues exist to fulfill the $21.5 billion worth of contracts. As a result, investors holding the contract to deliver the Feb. '09 issuance are rushing to buy out of it, according to David Boberski, head of interest-rate strategy at Bear Stearns.

This demand is causing the Feb.'09s to trade roughly 200 basis points tighter in the repo market. Boberski said this kind of squeeze is relatively rare and occurs about once a year. The rush to buy out of the contract has pushed up the bid on the contracts by more than two and a half tics and could go higher.

"It's one of the most extreme squeezes in recent memory," according to Alex Li, interest-rate strategist at Credit Suisse First Boston.

Market participants speculate that the squeeze is being caused by a single institution, perhaps a hedge fund, holding large portions of both the December contracts and the Feb. '09s to see how high the contracts will be bid. Li declined to speculate on which institution was causing the squeeze and said he had not seen it becoming a more common tactic.

  • 17 Dec 2004

All International Bonds

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 13 Mar 2017
1 JPMorgan 94,925.33 384 8.39%
2 Citi 87,531.58 331 7.74%
3 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 84,341.49 288 7.46%
4 Barclays 75,288.19 241 6.66%
5 Goldman Sachs 68,504.71 208 6.06%

Bookrunners of All Syndicated Loans EMEA

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 16 May 2017
1 Deutsche Bank 19,381.65 47 8.82%
2 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 18,968.25 36 8.63%
3 HSBC 18,103.95 50 8.24%
4 BNP Paribas 8,911.57 55 4.05%
5 SG Corporate & Investment Banking 8,885.00 54 4.04%

Bookrunners of all EMEA ECM Issuance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 23 May 2017
1 JPMorgan 8,714.26 35 8.36%
2 UBS 8,283.47 33 7.95%
3 Goldman Sachs 7,736.57 37 7.42%
4 Citi 6,897.11 46 6.62%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 6,215.31 24 5.96%