Top Section/Ad
Top Section/Ad
Most recent
Scrutiny of regulatory proposals by those without securitization expertise is a feature, not a bug
Tom Hall goes through a sterling week of deals for European ABS, while Thomas Hopkins dissects the dangers that a rise in LMEs would pose for European CLOs
Proposed 10% limit on interest would strip out most of securitizations' excess spread
Implementation necessary after wide-ranging changes last year
More articles/Ad
More articles/Ad
More articles
-
In this round-up, Pan Gongsheng, vice governor of the People’s Bank of China, suggests cancelling quota limits for the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) scheme, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) heightened scrutiny on offshore bond issuers, and the Hong Kong Insurance Authority prepares the ‘Mainland-Hong Kong Insurance Connect’. -
Acin says that data its platform collects to help banks identify where they are failing to mitigate operational risks could also give them leverage when talking to regulators about capital requirements.
-
China’s central bank offered investors a way of hedging the risk of a bank certificate of deposit this week, allowing Bank of Jinzhou to raise Rmb2bn ($289m) after suspicions it would be the next small bank to fail. Rebecca Feng reports.
-
The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (Afme) is preparing a response to the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s mortgage market consultation, to try to ensure that rules intended to help ‘mortgage prisoners’ do not hurt the broader UK securitization market.
-
The suspension of the Woodford Equity Income Fund and the collapse of London Capital & Finance show how retail investors lack regulatory protection. This is strange, when a source of safer returns — bonds issued by large banks — is often deemed too complex and risky for the ordinary person to invest in.
-
Quirks of Europe’s new Securitisation Regulation, which came into force this year and is dominating debate at this year’s IMN/Afme Global ABS conference in Barcelona, could leave CLO buyers carrying the can for failures of CLO managers to meet their regulatory obligations.
