BondMarker results: who rode the volatility best?
GlobalCapital, is part of the Delinian Group, DELINIAN (GLOBALCAPITAL) LIMITED, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 15236213
Copyright © DELINIAN (GLOBALCAPITAL) LIMITED and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
SSA

BondMarker results: who rode the volatility best?

Volatile exit

The BondMarker voters have spoken — read on to find out their views on the deals priced in the week beginning February 5.

There was strong volatility during that week and that was perhaps reflected in what was a much wider spread of average BondMarker scores across the five deal categories available for voting (pricing, timing, structure/maturity, quality of the investor distribution and performance) than during the benign conditions earlier in the year.

Topping the bill with an average of 8.64 was the UK — a perennial strong performer — with a £2.75bn tap of its August 2048 linker. Bank of America Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, Lloyds Bank and Santander were leads.

At the other end of the scale was Greece’s €3bn February 2025 — run by Barclays, BNP Paribas, Citi, JP Morgan and Nomura — that scored an average of just 4.60. Its score was weighed down by a low 2.50 for performance.

Seven trades scored an average score in the 7.0s — EIB’s $4bn May 2021 (7.82), Ontario’s $3bn February 2021 (7.74), Sweden’s $3bn February 2021 (7.73), Finland’s €3bn April 2034 (7.66), CEB’s $1bn February 2023 (7.64), BNG’s $1.5bn February 2021 (7.21) and CAF’s €1bn February 2025 (7.05).

EFSF’s €3bn February 2028 came in just below that with an average score of 6.86 and Bpifrance’s €1bn February 2023 scored 5.98. Both trades, like Greece, had fairly low scores for performance — 6.55 and 5.63, respectively.

Deals in wc Feb BondMarker results

Related articles

Gift this article