Bond Connect: Be careful what you wish for

China’s move to open up its domestic bond market to more foreign investment is being rightly applauded. But investors should be wary of the risks in a market that still has serious problems with governance and disclosure.

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 04 Jul 2017
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Chinese regulators took a big step towards a fully-liberalised bond market this week, when they finally approved the launch of a Bond Connect scheme that will allow international investors access to onshore renminbi debt. That has been greeted with excitement, with analysts now predicting Chinese bonds being added to a variety of global indices, and a huge inflow of funds as a result.

But investors should pause for thought before they get too excited about their new access to China’s bond market. There is still plenty to fear about a market that still operates in ways that defy international standards.

There could be few better examples than the recent woes of Hongye Chemical Group, a privately-owned company based in the eastern Shandong province. The company was forced to suspend trading of its onshore renminbi bonds because of uncertainty over its operating performance, but after the suspension it emerged that some of its deals had been guaranteed by an unlikely ally.

Shandong Yuhuang Chemical Co, another private company from the same area with no apparent links to Hongye, had guaranteed Rmb1.35bn ($198.9m) of Hongye’s bonds and loans. It is potentially on the hook should Hongye default, no doubt a surprise to investors who may have naturally assumed that a chemical company would not morph into a credit guarantor overnight.

Perhaps more damning is that the situation does not appear to be an isolated case. For one thing, Hongye has similarly guaranteed some of Yuhuang Chemical’s notes — and analysts believe there are numerous other cross-guarantees in Shandong and other provinces linking firms in potentially dangerous ways.

This would be almost tolerable if China had a vibrant domestic rating sector, but it doesn’t. Onshore agencies have a reputation for doling out investment grade status to issuers without a second thought. Nor does their emphasis on government support reassure global investors who are increasingly worried about the government letting domestic firms fail.

There is a good chance that foreign investors will help improve both problems. Foreign demand for Yuhuang Chemical’s debut dollar bond in March cast a light on its issues at home. International rating agencies look set to play a great role in rating local bonds, after the People’s Bank of China said this week it would allow foreign ratings agencies to assess the credit risks of domestic debt.

That move was indicative of the wider strengths of China’s regulators. They have done an admirable job over the last few years, overcoming a tendency towards in-fighting to announce a raft of truly significant measures, including Bond Connect itself. Given the country’s explosive growth over the last three decades, it is little wonder its capital markets will suffer from teething problems.

But this does not hide the fact that China’s domestic bond market still has serious shortcomings. Investors tempted to jump into the market should do so with their eyes wide open. The opportunities are rife — but so are the risks.

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 04 Jul 2017

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 18.86
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 14.39
3 China Merchants Bank Co 14.21
4 China Merchants Securities Co 8.85
5 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 5.90

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $bn No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 China International Capital Corp Ltd 3.40 16 15.11%
2 Morgan Stanley 3.15 9 13.99%
3 CITIC Securities 1.85 5 8.23%
4 China Securities Co Ltd 1.64 4 7.29%
5 Citi 1.49 9 6.60%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $bn No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 4.74 23 8.13%
2 HSBC 3.87 34 6.65%
3 Credit Suisse 3.37 24 5.79%
4 UBS 3.28 18 5.63%
5 BofA Securities 3.23 10 5.55%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital China 2019 awards winners: Part III

    In the final part of GlobalCapital China’s awards announcement, we discuss the key innovation of 2019, and reveal the individual that has made the greatest contribution to reforming and internationalising the Chinese onshore market.

  • GlobalCapital China 2019 awards winners: Part II

    In the second part of GlobalCapital China’s awards announcement, we reveal the winning banks across Panda bonds, G3 bonds and ABS, as well as the best bank for securities services and the most impressive law firm.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2019: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out which firms have been named the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2019.

  • GlobalCapital China announces 2019 awards winners: Part I

    GlobalCapital China, previously GlobalRMB, is pleased to announce the winners of its annual capital markets awards, honouring the banks, companies and individuals that have made the biggest contribution to bridging the gap between China’s markets and the rest of the world. In part one of the awards, we reveal the most impressive issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2019: Bonds

    In part three of GlobalCapital Asia's awards results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.