Bond Connect: Be careful what you wish for

China’s move to open up its domestic bond market to more foreign investment is being rightly applauded. But investors should be wary of the risks in a market that still has serious problems with governance and disclosure.

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 04 Jul 2017
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Chinese regulators took a big step towards a fully-liberalised bond market this week, when they finally approved the launch of a Bond Connect scheme that will allow international investors access to onshore renminbi debt. That has been greeted with excitement, with analysts now predicting Chinese bonds being added to a variety of global indices, and a huge inflow of funds as a result.

But investors should pause for thought before they get too excited about their new access to China’s bond market. There is still plenty to fear about a market that still operates in ways that defy international standards.

There could be few better examples than the recent woes of Hongye Chemical Group, a privately-owned company based in the eastern Shandong province. The company was forced to suspend trading of its onshore renminbi bonds because of uncertainty over its operating performance, but after the suspension it emerged that some of its deals had been guaranteed by an unlikely ally.

Shandong Yuhuang Chemical Co, another private company from the same area with no apparent links to Hongye, had guaranteed Rmb1.35bn ($198.9m) of Hongye’s bonds and loans. It is potentially on the hook should Hongye default, no doubt a surprise to investors who may have naturally assumed that a chemical company would not morph into a credit guarantor overnight.

Perhaps more damning is that the situation does not appear to be an isolated case. For one thing, Hongye has similarly guaranteed some of Yuhuang Chemical’s notes — and analysts believe there are numerous other cross-guarantees in Shandong and other provinces linking firms in potentially dangerous ways.

This would be almost tolerable if China had a vibrant domestic rating sector, but it doesn’t. Onshore agencies have a reputation for doling out investment grade status to issuers without a second thought. Nor does their emphasis on government support reassure global investors who are increasingly worried about the government letting domestic firms fail.

There is a good chance that foreign investors will help improve both problems. Foreign demand for Yuhuang Chemical’s debut dollar bond in March cast a light on its issues at home. International rating agencies look set to play a great role in rating local bonds, after the People’s Bank of China said this week it would allow foreign ratings agencies to assess the credit risks of domestic debt.

That move was indicative of the wider strengths of China’s regulators. They have done an admirable job over the last few years, overcoming a tendency towards in-fighting to announce a raft of truly significant measures, including Bond Connect itself. Given the country’s explosive growth over the last three decades, it is little wonder its capital markets will suffer from teething problems.

But this does not hide the fact that China’s domestic bond market still has serious shortcomings. Investors tempted to jump into the market should do so with their eyes wide open. The opportunities are rife — but so are the risks.

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 04 Jul 2017

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 23.56
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 16.09
3 China Merchants Securities Co 11.38
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 6.90
5 HSBC 5.75

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 10,402.38 44 7.46%
2 CITIC Securities 10,076.72 56 7.23%
3 Morgan Stanley 8,137.73 53 5.84%
4 China International Capital Corp Ltd 7,629.46 48 5.47%
5 UBS 7,571.63 56 5.43%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 25,845.51 224 8.48%
2 Citi 19,878.62 143 6.52%
3 JPMorgan 15,342.51 106 5.03%
4 Standard Chartered Bank 13,851.25 136 4.55%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 11,261.66 88 3.70%

Asian polls & awards

  • Now open! GlobalCapital Asia Capital Market Awards 2019

    GlobalCapital Asia is pleased to invite pitches for our annual capital markets and investment banking awards, which reward the most impressive transactions and investment banks of 2019.

  • GlobalCapital reveals SRI Award nominations

    GlobalCapital has published the nominations for its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards. The winners will be announced on September 17, at our Awards Ceremony in Amsterdam.

  • GlobalCapital SRI Awards: poll extended

    In response to requests from market participants, GlobalCapital has extended the closing date of its poll to determine the 2019 winners of its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards. Market participants can now vote until July 26.

  • GlobalCapital opens 2019 poll for SRI Awards

    GlobalCapital has launched its poll to determine the 2019 winners of its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards. Market participants are invited to participate.

  • GlobalCapital launches Sustainable Financing and Investing Survey

    GlobalCapital is conducting a global research survey on the fast-changing markets for sustainable financing and investing. It will combine the views of issuers and investors to give a nuanced picture of how this trend is changing capital markets for both groups.