Best Rating Agency for Corporate Bonds: S&P Global Ratings
GlobalCapital, is part of the Delinian Group, DELINIAN (GLOBALCAPITAL) LIMITED, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 15236213
Copyright © DELINIAN (GLOBALCAPITAL) LIMITED and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Polls and Awards

Best Rating Agency for Corporate Bonds: S&P Global Ratings

It is hard, if not impossible, to think of a single event that has changed the financial outlook for so many companies as quickly as the Covid-19 pandemic. Corporates, investors and other capital markets participants raced to grasp the implications, putting ratings agencies in the spotlight.

S&P Global Ratings immediately understood its two key aims. “Transparency and time to market were crucial for us,” says Alexandra Dimitrijevic, managing director, global head of research.

When the pandemic struck the firm made all its macro and sectoral research related to the impact of Covid-19 available for free, creating a dedicated page on its website.

It also responded to investors’ needs for more timely information. So, instead of its usual schedule of updating its macro forecasts every quarter, it moved to updating them as soon it had new information. “There was unprecedented speed of change, from the economic shut down, through to the recovery story,” says Dimitrijevic. “It was really important to update the market because our macro views really underpin our credit analysis.”

S&P has published more than 630 articles looking at the pandemic’s sectoral impact. To help investors make sense of this flood of information, it provided bite-sized summaries. It also made its webinar series more frequent, moving to a weekly slot that attracted over 60,000 people during the first half of 2020, triple last year’s audience.

It was also crucial to signal its changing views on ratings in as timely a manner as possible. 

“Time to market absolutely does not mean we were quick to downgrade,” says Dimitrijevic. “What we focused on was the resilience of corporates to a short recession and that was reflected in downgrades.”

By September, it had made around 2,000 rating actions related to the twin issues of the pandemic and the oil price collapse, of which half were downgrades. Most downgrades were at the single-B level and below, with 80% of rating actions concentrated at speculative grade. “For these companies, it’s really a question of survival,” says Dimitrijevic.

In the spring, S&P focussed on the impact of Covid-19, but by July it had turned to the shape of the recovery. Helping investors understand the implications over the longer term is a central part of its operations.

Environmental, social and governance issues have become central in recent years and the pandemic accelerated the trend. Ever more investors are including ESG factors into their credit analysis or screening. 

S&P launched ESG Evaluation, a new product, in 2019 to help investors and the product took off this year, says Lynn Maxwell, managing director, head of sales (EMEA). “It’s a deep dive into the ‘E’, the ‘S’ and the ‘G’ of corporates but what further differentiates our offering is that it is focused on a company’s preparedness for future challenges on these topics.”

It takes into account a strategic dialogue with the entity’s management about its ESG approach and then sustainable finance experts and credit analysts have an input. “We can bring in all the industry expertise and the knowledge of the company and its governance and strategy and then marry that to our ESG and sustainable finance expertise,” says Maxwell.

S&P can also take pride in its work with the Bank of England during the crisis. The Covid Corporate Financing Facility, set up by the government and the Bank to help larger firms to bridge the disruption, required applicants to be considered investment grade whether or not they had a rating. 

The firm worked with the Bank on its credit assessments for no fees. “We wanted very much to ensure that this programme could have the impact that it was intended to have,” says Maxwell. 

Related articles

  • Agencies sharpen tactics in year of the yield grab

    The pace of issuance from agency issuers has been remarkable this year as investors’ renewed love affair with fixed income heats up. But there are still challenges to getting deals done, meaning borrowers must come up with new ways to keep funding ticking over, writes Georgie Lee
  • Sovereigns reach retail inflection point

    Savvy government issuers have been able to fund record volumes from retail investors since interest rates began to rise, which contributed to tighter spreads, even as debt-to-GDP ratios increased. But where next now that banks have caught up, the ECB has cut rates and household liquidity has receded? Georgie Lee investigates
  • No easy wins in development bank power-up

    There has never been so much momentum to reform the multilateral development banks. But most of the many avenues to expand their lending have run into difficulties. Jon Hay reports
  • ‘Big leap forward’ needed to propel EU to safe asset status

    For those hoping that the EU, with its swollen borrowing programme since the pandemic, could become a common European safe asset, the wait may take a little longer as the issuer works to establish itself as a sovereign-like entity and the bloc struggles to make progress on Capital Markets Union. Addison Gong reports
  • Issuers, you call this volatility?

    Many FIG issuers were quick to abandon the primary market this week, but it could get a lot worse
  • Macron risk: a blessing in disguise

    The SSA bond market could benefit from an early summer
Gift this article