China reforms QFII, RQFII but leaves critical problems untouched

China’s move to remove the quota limits on the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) and renminbi QFII (RQFII) schemes could help in the long-term development of the country’s financial market. But this is not nearly enough. If the regulators want to see some serious change, they need to tackle two key hurdles facing foreign investors.

  • By Rebecca Feng
  • 17 Sep 2019
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (Safe) removed the total $300bn quota set for the entire QFII programme and individual quotas assigned to each QFII and RQFII last week. The decision, other than helping to attract more foreign capital, also demonstrated China’s effort to revive the country’s two oldest access schemes.

Reformation of QFII and RQFII has accelerated since 2016, after the launch of the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connects. The same year, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) cancelled a requirement that at least half of the QFIIs’ investments must be in stocks. It went up a gear in June 2018, by removing the three-month lock-up period on repatriation of principals and the 20% cap on repatriation of principal and profits from QFII investments.

While those developments are positive, they have only scratched the surface when it comes to turning the QFII and RQFII schemes around.

What China needs to do is remove two big obstacles present in the access schemes and in almost all of its market opening-up measures — strict outbound capital controls and onerous administrative procedures.

A key reason why foreign investors moved to the Stock Connects is they offer easier repatriation of proceeds. After all, foreign investors will be trading through Hong Kong SAR, a much more open market in terms of capital controls.

Although regulators did make attempts to make repatriating profits from QFII and RQFII investments easier, foreign investors still face a considerable number of barriers remitting money back home.

For example, the Chinese tax authorities and Safe require QFIIs and RQFIIs to file their investment profits with local tax bureaus. Further, the QFIIs and RQFIIs have to present “stamped” filings to the remitting banks before the banks can repatriate their schemes’ proceeds offshore. These requirements have slowed down repatriation and disincentivised foreign investors from using QFII and RQFII.

What is more curious is that the filings are no longer used to determine the amount of tax liabilities foreign investors have. Rather, their sole function is to help Safe keep track of capital outflows generated by foreign investors. For now, foreign institutional investors are exempted from tax on interest gained from investing in Chinese domestic bonds and equities.

In addition, Safe reserves the right to jump in and control QFII repatriation if China’s national economic and financial situations change or it needs to maintain supply and demand in the FX market, according to the most recent rules governing QFII and RQFII.

The clause has existed for years, despite suggestions from market participants and trade associations that it should be scrapped. This year, for example, China has tightened capital control quite a bit compared with last year, onshore bankers believe.

This tight control doesn’t work for foreign investors, who want laws to protect their ability to repatriate money offshore rather than being subject to the whims of Chinese regulators. The concern has also been heightened recently since foreign ownership of Chinese securities is set to rise dramatically due to index inclusions of Chinese bonds and equities by global index providers.

The nail in the coffin for QFIIs and RQFIIs is the fact that the CSRC only allows them to be traded through three brokers on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and three on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. This makes it hard for foreign institutional investors to offer more choice to their clients and discourages open competition among onshore brokers.

All these are enough reasons for foreign accounts to ditch QFII and RQFII. That they have stepped back from them is already clear. Only $111.4bn of the $300bn aggregated QFII quota had been allocated to foreign investors by the end of August, according to Safe. And only Rmb693.3bn ($97.4bn) of the Rmb1.99tr RQFII quota available was taken up.

That’s not to say the two channels don’t offer perks. QFIIs and RQFIIs can bid in primary market activities, such as onshore IPOs, which offers much higher profitability than trading in China’s secondary market in China.

Secondly, the scope of available securities is much wider for QFIIs and RQFIIs compared to their Stock Connect counterparts. For Stock Connect participants, only stocks that belong to the four key indexes or those that have corresponding H-shares listed in Hong Kong are eligible. But for QFII and RQFII schemes, bonds, stocks, warrants, funds and index futures are all eligible, providing foreign investors more hedging tools.

There are key benefits for using one access channel over the other. But if the regulators have set their sights on reforming QFII and RQFII, there’s more work yet to be done.

  • By Rebecca Feng
  • 17 Sep 2019

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 27.09
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 12.86
3 China Merchants Bank Co 11.85
4 China Merchants Securities Co 9.09
5 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 5.51

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $b No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 11.56 53 7.01%
2 CITIC Securities 11.15 64 6.77%
3 China International Capital Corp Ltd 9.66 56 5.86%
4 Morgan Stanley 9.43 59 5.72%
5 UBS 9.43 72 5.72%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $b No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 29.34 258 8.39%
2 Citi 23.65 166 6.76%
3 JPMorgan 16.38 120 4.69%
4 Standard Chartered Bank 16.07 163 4.60%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 12.50 94 3.57%

Asian polls & awards

  • Finance Minister of the Year, CEE

    Djamshid Kuchkarov, Uzbekistan

  • GlobalCapital China Capital Market Awards 2019: open for submissions

    GlobalCapital China is pleased to invite you to participate in the GlobalCapital China Capital Market Awards 2019. Inaugurated last year under the GlobalRMB banner, the awards celebrate the accomplishments of the leading players in the renminbi debt capital markets, onshore and offshore, as well as key service providers.

  • Last chance! GlobalCapital Asia Capital Market Awards 2019

    GlobalCapital Asia is pleased to invite pitches for our annual capital markets and investment banking awards, which reward the most impressive transactions and investment banks of 2019.

  • GlobalCapital reveals SRI Award nominations

    GlobalCapital has published the nominations for its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards. The winners will be announced on September 17, at our Awards Ceremony in Amsterdam.

  • GlobalCapital SRI Awards: poll extended

    In response to requests from market participants, GlobalCapital has extended the closing date of its poll to determine the 2019 winners of its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards. Market participants can now vote until July 26.