Star board: a roller coaster ride to remember

The first 25 companies that started trading on the new Shanghai tech board on Monday skyrocketed, as Chinese investors welcomed the Nasdaq-style equity market with frenzied trading. As the excitement cooled on Tuesday, the bourse’s performance shows that regulators must not just focus on market reform, but also on market participants.

  • By Rebecca Feng
  • 23 Jul 2019
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

The Star Market, a new board aimed at revolutionising China’s onshore stock market and drawing technology firms back to the country, opened with a boom on Monday. While it is normal for a company’s stock price to pop on its debut, the performance of some of the maiden stocks on Star was a whole different story.

By the end of the first trading day, the 25 names experienced an average stock price increase of 140%. The top gainer, Anji Microelectronics, spiked at a jaw-dropping 400% from its offering price. Even the company with the smallest jump, Harbin Xinguang Optic-Electronics Technology, boasted a 84% increase in its share price.

This would have been less shocking had these companies listed on China’s main A–share market, where offering prices have been capped at 23 times earnings by the China Securities Regulatory Commission since 2014.

With no such limits on the Star, the stocks on the bourse are in no way cheap. At the time of pricing, some investors were spooked by the issuers’ high price to earnings ratios. The 25 IPOs were priced anywhere from 18.86 times earnings for state-owned China Railway Signal and Communication to a lofty 170.75 times earnings for semiconductor manufacturer Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment. On average, the PE ratio reached 49.16 times.

It is natural to expect limited upside growth for Star companies given their high valuations. Analysts both onshore and offshore expected most stocks to rise 20%-40%, with a turnover of around 35%-65%.

But they underestimated institutional investors’ willingness to practice, and succeed in, what they repeatedly do in the A–share market — push stock prices high and sell them to hungry retail investors and funds that did not get any pre-IPO shares.

Monday’s performance spoke volumes. One company halted trading after one minute after its price increased more than 30%, and six more halted trading within five minutes for the same reason. But as stock prices kept rising throughout the day, institutional investors started selling.

By the end of Monday, the average turnover of the 25 stocks reached 78%, meaning most investors with pre-IPO shares sold them in the market. At least five equity traders and asset managers told GlobalRMB or the local media that they would not return anytime soon. The accumulated market cap of the Star board reached Rmb538.8bn ($78bn) and four dollar billionaires were born, although most of them will likely lose that title fairly soon.

Tuesday was a slightly different story though. Twenty-one of the 25 stocks saw their prices drop. Fourteen slumped by more than 10%, and the average turnover rate shrank to 36%.

The regulators have few choices now. They have made promises, time and again in the 259 days since Chinese president Xi Jinping first brought up the idea for a tech board, to make the Star Market fully market driven with a transparent price discovery process. Currently, the Star board has no daily limits for the first five days and after that has a more lenient 20% daily limit gain or drop, compared with 10% for the A–share market. It also allows investors to short-sell on the first day of trading, a practice forbidden elsewhere in the country until three months after a stock’s debut.

The feverish excitement seen among Star investors so far is unsustainable. To avoid getting their fingers burnt, a less opportunistic approach would be wise.

More importantly, this week’s two hectic days of trading provided an important lesson. Having a mature market with less stringent rules is one thing, but equally necessary is having a mature investor base. China’s Star Market needs to be able to walk before it can run.

  • By Rebecca Feng
  • 23 Jul 2019

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 18.86
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 14.39
3 China Merchants Bank Co 14.21
4 China Merchants Securities Co 8.85
5 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 5.90

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $bn No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 China International Capital Corp Ltd 4.57 23 13.11%
2 China Securities Co Ltd 3.53 7 10.12%
3 Morgan Stanley 3.39 11 9.71%
4 CITIC Securities 3.29 11 9.44%
5 Citi 1.66 11 4.75%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $bn No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 6.57 36 7.82%
2 HSBC 5.80 49 6.91%
3 BofA Securities 4.13 14 4.92%
4 UBS 4.10 25 4.89%
5 JPMorgan 3.96 25 4.71%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital China 2019 awards winners: Part III

    In the final part of GlobalCapital China’s awards announcement, we discuss the key innovation of 2019, and reveal the individual that has made the greatest contribution to reforming and internationalising the Chinese onshore market.

  • GlobalCapital China 2019 awards winners: Part II

    In the second part of GlobalCapital China’s awards announcement, we reveal the winning banks across Panda bonds, G3 bonds and ABS, as well as the best bank for securities services and the most impressive law firm.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2019: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out which firms have been named the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2019.

  • GlobalCapital China announces 2019 awards winners: Part I

    GlobalCapital China, previously GlobalRMB, is pleased to announce the winners of its annual capital markets awards, honouring the banks, companies and individuals that have made the biggest contribution to bridging the gap between China’s markets and the rest of the world. In part one of the awards, we reveal the most impressive issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2019: Bonds

    In part three of GlobalCapital Asia's awards results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.