The struggle continues for Chinese property companies

Chinese property companies that have been relying heavily on the country’s banks for their offshore loans should beware. The mainland bank lending tap may not be open for too long.

  • By Pan Yue
  • 19 Sep 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Property companies in China cannot get a break. Since the Chinese government started to tackle the issue of high leverage last year in a number of industries, including real estate, property developers have struggled to raise funds from the onshore market. It was only natural then for them to turn to offshore bonds to fulfil their funding requirements.

But what could the developers do when the government made even that avenue harder to access in June, by only allowing real estate credits to sell bonds internationally if the proceeds were for refinancing? The loan market proved the saviour.

So far this year, 21 property developers have announced or closed offshore loans worth a sizeable $15.5bn, according to Dealogic. In comparison, during the same time last year, 23 deals worth a smaller $10.9bn were issued, while in the 2016 year-to-date, the numbers stood at 23 deals worth $9.8bn.

The appeal of loans is easy to see. The bank lending market in Asia is deep, with lenders willing to put their money to work. Notably, Chinese banks have rarely shied away from supporting their country’s borrowers, as reflected in some of the numbers. Of the 21 property loans so far this year, 10 of the deals were lead by Mainland banks, or featured Chinese banks heavily among the mandated lead arrangers in case of a club-style deal.

But borrowers should be prepared for a reality check. International and Taiwanese banks have been stepping away slowly from property deals as they are cautious about the impact of the deleveraging policy on the industry. Many of the banks are increasingly selective, for example, by only lending to the top five companies by assets, or state-owned enterprises only.

Chinese banks too are coming under pressure. The pick-up in deal flow from property issuers this year means many of the lenders are now close to hitting their limits on lending to the industry.

Chinese banks that still have room to offer loans are also taking a more cautious approach.

They are doing this in a few ways — by being selective and lending only to stronger credits, by narrowing their list of eligible borrowers to the top 20 firms from the top 50 companies before, and by demanding juicer pricing. For example, one Hong Kong-based banker from a Chinese lender said his firm will need 90bp to 120bp in margin from a triple-B rated borrower seeking a three year facility — a rise from their previous expectations.

Needless to say, times are tougher for China’s property companies. They should be prepared for a bumpy ride.  

  • By Pan Yue
  • 19 Sep 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 China Merchants Securities Co 15.31
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 12.35
3 CITIC Securities 8.92
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 7.60
5 China CITIC Bank Corp 6.76

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 17,554.09 85 7.59%
2 Morgan Stanley 14,624.46 73 6.32%
3 Citi 14,360.81 97 6.21%
4 UBS 13,054.43 87 5.64%
5 China International Capital Corp Ltd 11,355.46 47 4.91%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 25,688.46 224 7.63%
2 Citi 23,876.05 159 7.09%
3 JPMorgan 15,663.09 97 4.65%
4 Goldman Sachs 13,751.52 67 4.09%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 13,613.92 86 4.04%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2018.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Bonds

    In part three of our results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best Local Currency Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the debut winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Equities

    In part two of our results announcements, we reveal the winning equity deals and banks, including the Best Follow-on/Accelerated Bookbuild, Best Equity-Linked Deal, Best IPO, Best ECM Deal and Best ECM House.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Loans

    GlobalCapital Asia has spent the last two months talking to banks and their clients in a bid to determine the most impressive capital markets transactions and advisers across Asia ex-Japan in 2018. We are pleased to begin our awards announcements in the loan market.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Most impressive issuers, best law firm

    In this third part of the GlobalRMB awards, we present our reasons for choosing the best issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories — and praise the strong performance of one well-known foreign law firm.