IPOs — swipe left

As Asian exchanges increasingly embrace the US model for new listings — the introduction of variable voting rights being a case in point — disintermediated IPOs may perhaps soon be the next fad, writes Clawback.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 02 Aug 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Remember Spotify’s listing on the New York Stock Exchange last April? The music streaming business was valued at $29bn through a process called direct listing. It didn’t involve the raising of new money by the company and relied on sales of shares by existing holders to create liquidity in the aftermarket.

As it happens, volumes on the exchange were particularly subdued, and Spotify’s share price closed around 10% below its opening price on the first day of trading, pouring cold water on similar attempts at creative primary equity by many a unicorn.

Similarly, in 2004, Google listed on Nasdaq through a widely-criticised Dutch auction, only managing to price its shares at the lower end of the indicative price range.

In both cases, the general idea was to bypass Wall Street underwriters and do away with the traditional IPO process. This is arguably cheaper and faster and avoids the regulatory issues associated with a “normal” initial offering. But does it really work? The truth is, not really.

In order to be successful, a new listing by and large requires two essential components.

One is enough shares being offered to investors, so as to create (and sustain) liquidity after the listing, when shares start trading in the aftermarket.

With a direct listing (or through a listing by way of introduction, which is more common in Asia) that usually doesn’t happen. Spotify was a well-know — one would even say a household — name, yet, even in its case, liquidity was poor.

The process also only works when a company already has the requisite minimum number of shareholders prescribed by the exchange (300 in Hong Kong, or 500 in Singapore). This is why bona fide IPOs generally incorporate public offers to retail investors (even in a billion-dollar IPO, one would be hard pressed to allocate shares to so many institutions).

So, in any event, the listing candidate will need to have done several rounds of pre-IPO funding and, most likely, allocated shares before listing to a significant number of its employees. An unlikely scenario for most mid-caps.

It’s even worse in the case of a second (or third) listing. In such a case, there already is a market on which the shares are readily traded, and on which investors will naturally place orders to buy and sell stock. There simply is no incentive for them to do so on an unproven marketplace, where lower (or even no) liquidity invariably results in worse pricing.

The other key requirement is a decent book of demand, so as to be able to anchor shares with a core group of quality institutions who will support trading by topping up their IPO allocations, and remain as shareholders for the long haul, rather than just flip the stock after listing.

Key to that is the allocation process, through which the bookrunners assign shares to institutions they deem more likely to be long-term shareholders and either “zero” or hand out low allocations to others.

The process of selecting which institutions are quality market participants, and which aren’t, simply doesn’t happen through a Dutch auction process, where the only criteria used is the quantity of shares ordered at various prices, rather than the quality of the underlying investors.

An IPO is a long, complex and expensive process that is best left to the professionals to manage. Assessing the quality of investors requires extensive knowledge, which an issuer whose core business doesn’t involve buying, selling and trading equities is unlikely to possess.

Disintermediation may perhaps come to Asian markets, but it will probably remain a marginal option, and likely won’t mean good news for issuers and investors.

Think of it as an internet hook-up app. It may be new and perhaps even exciting (to some) — but it won’t phase out traditional dating. For good reason.

Clawback columnist Philippe Espinasse was a capital markets banker for almost 20 years and is now an independent consultant in Hong Kong. He is the author of “IPO: A Global Guide”, “IPO Banks: Pitch, Selection and Mandate”, and of the Hong Kong thrillers “Hard Underwriting” and “The Traveler”. His new book, “Cornerstone Investors: A practice Guide for Asian IPOs” was published in January 2018.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 02 Aug 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 21.85
2 China Merchants Securities Co 14.67
3 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 14.44
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 8.89
5 China Securities 7.41

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 CITIC Securities 9,346.38 46 7.79%
2 Goldman Sachs 8,791.68 35 7.33%
3 Morgan Stanley 7,131.69 47 5.94%
4 China International Capital Corp Ltd 6,923.83 42 5.77%
5 UBS 6,281.96 46 5.24%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 21,623.09 187 8.54%
2 Citi 15,676.35 116 6.19%
3 JPMorgan 13,488.58 90 5.33%
4 Standard Chartered Bank 10,556.88 105 4.17%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 9,701.88 75 3.83%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital SRI Awards: poll extended

    In response to requests from market participants, GlobalCapital has extended the closing date of its poll to determine the 2019 winners of its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards. Market participants can now vote until July 26.

  • GlobalCapital opens 2019 poll for SRI Awards

    GlobalCapital has launched its poll to determine the 2019 winners of its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards. Market participants are invited to participate.

  • GlobalCapital launches Sustainable Financing and Investing Survey

    GlobalCapital is conducting a global research survey on the fast-changing markets for sustainable financing and investing. It will combine the views of issuers and investors to give a nuanced picture of how this trend is changing capital markets for both groups.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2018.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Bonds

    In part three of our results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best Local Currency Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the debut winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.