SGX ready to give no quarter

In the latest Clawback, columnist Philippe Espinasse puts the Singapore Exchange's proposal on quarterly reporting by companies under the microscope.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 15 Jan 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Earlier this month, the Singapore Exchange (SGX) announced that it was seeking feedback from market participants on whether to retain quarterly reporting, which the bourse first introduced in 2003. 

The reason for this, it says, is that listed companies have repeatedly raised concerns about compliance costs. The real reason, however, perhaps lies in the fact that the SGX’s arch-rival Hong Kong’s HKEX — unlike Taiwan, Malaysia, the Chinese Mainland, or, of course, the US — still does not require companies listed on its platform to publish quarterly accounts.

As I already wrote in December 2014, in Hong Kong, companies listed on GEM, the exchange’s second board, must publish quarterly accounts. As do issuers with a dual A/H share listing on the main board (but only because the authorities on the Mainland actually require them to do so). However, most companies that are listed on HKEX still are not required to disclose quarterly accounts to investors, and semi-annual reporting very much remains the norm. Even major Hong Kong-listed multinational businesses such as HSBC only commenced quarterly financial reporting as recently as 2011.

The SGX has proposed several options, should quarterly reporting in Singapore ultimately be retained.

One alternative could see the bar for quarterly reporting, currently only compulsory for companies with a market capitalisation of S$75m ($57m), raised to S$150m. About 70% of companies listed on the SGX currently report on a quarterly basis, as compared to only 37% when quarterly reporting was first introduced in Singapore some 15 years ago.

Another alternative could see quarterly reporting again only becoming compulsory for companies with a market capitalisation of S$150m, as well as with a shareholder holding at least 15% of their shares (the obvious concern there being the protection of minority shareholders).

The SGX also remains open to other options that may be suggested by investors.

In addition, the SGX proposes that, should quarterly reporting be retained, minority shareholders could vote to opt out of quarterly reporting every three years (however unlikely that may sound); that the content of company reports for the first and third quarters be simplified to the balance sheet, income statement, cash-flow statement, review of performance, commentary of significant trends and board confirmation only — which is not unreasonable; and that newly listed companies may be exempted from quarterly reporting until the third annual general meeting after the listing date — which doesn’t sound all that right in my view, as investors are probably more likely to carefully scrutinise a company that has just come to market, as compared to one that has been reporting on a regular basis for a number of years.

All such proposals — which may be implemented together or separately in the second half of this year — are subject to feedback and approval by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

As a director of a company listed in Asia, I can attest that quarterly reporting has certainly become more extensive in recent years. This is especially true in the case of financial businesses. This will be further enhanced this year with the introduction of IFRS 9 on requirements for the recognition and measurement, impairment, derecognition, and general hedge accounting for financial instruments, a minefield for which many CFOs and accounting departments are probably ill-prepared.

However, together with the longstanding saga on weighted voting rights, which both the SGX and HKEX have now adopted — albeit in different guises — the end of quarterly reporting sounds like yet another sorry episode in the race to the bottom between listing platforms, and, unfortunately, a major setback for investors.

Philippe Espinasse was a capital markets banker for almost 20 years and is now an independent consultant in Hong Kong. He is the author of “IPO: A Global Guide”, “IPO Banks: Pitch, Selection and Mandate”, and of the Hong Kong thrillers “Hard Underwriting” and “The Traveler”. His new book, “Cornerstone Investors: A Practice Guide for Asian IPOs” is being published in January 2018.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 15 Jan 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 China Merchants Securities Co 14.44
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 11.65
3 Bank of China (BOC) 10.33
4 CITIC Securities 8.41
5 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 7.17

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 UBS 325.93 2 10.80%
2 CITIC Securities 311.43 3 10.32%
3 HSBC 295.77 1 9.80%
4 JPMorgan 249.95 1 8.29%
5 Citi 209.35 2 6.94%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 1,494.98 10 12.16%
2 Westpac 870.85 3 7.08%
3 JPMorgan 668.81 5 5.44%
4 Citi 655.35 5 5.33%
5 Standard Chartered Bank 642.66 4 5.23%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2018.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Bonds

    In part three of our results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best Local Currency Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the debut winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Equities

    In part two of our results announcements, we reveal the winning equity deals and banks, including the Best Follow-on/Accelerated Bookbuild, Best Equity-Linked Deal, Best IPO, Best ECM Deal and Best ECM House.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Loans

    GlobalCapital Asia has spent the last two months talking to banks and their clients in a bid to determine the most impressive capital markets transactions and advisers across Asia ex-Japan in 2018. We are pleased to begin our awards announcements in the loan market.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Most impressive issuers, best law firm

    In this third part of the GlobalRMB awards, we present our reasons for choosing the best issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories — and praise the strong performance of one well-known foreign law firm.