He who pays the piper calls the tune

Or so the saying goes. Not in China, it seems. Breaking the news that a bulge bracket firm in Hong Kong is suing a Chinese SOE client for non-payment of fees, our columnist Clawback says doing business in China is now little more than a league table exercise.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 08 Dec 2016
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

International investment banks in Hong Kong are learning the hard way how to do business with their clients from across the border. Not only must they face ever more crowded underwriting syndicates and growing competition from domestic houses, slashing what had once been a comfortable revenue stream, they now struggle to get paid altogether by some of their clients from the Mainland. This adds a clear degree of frustration to what was already an increasingly difficult way of making money in the region.

Indeed, Clawback has it on good authority that, after years of frustration, one of the members of the bulge bracket in the SAR (which shall however remain nameless) and a major player there has at long last decided to bite the bullet and sue one of its state-owned enterprise clients, in a bid to recoup investment banking fees that were due, but never paid. When asked whether it feared this could negatively impact its business in China, its philosophical answer was that there wasn’t much business in the first place if all you ever did was pro bono work.

Other major firms have long complained that they are routinely unable to ultimately get paid by Chinese clients, many of which are already demanding in the extreme, and whose transactions can also be extremely time consuming. It’s no wonder that some houses are now pulling back from the region, as revenues have failed to offset the cost of maintaining what is necessarily a sizeable footprint.

This is unlikely to be the case as far as underwriting IPOs is concerned: management, underwriting and selling fees are typically deducted from the proceeds raised from the end-investors before they are in turn paid to issuers. But with the number of bookrunners routinely topping twenty or more on many of the larger deals, the share of the pie to which each of them becomes entitled has now more often than not dwindled into the hundreds of thousands of US dollars, rather than the millions that were received only five or ten years ago.

As a case in point, the fees on the $7.4bn IPO of Postal Savings Bank of China (PSBC), details of which were buried on page 546 of the prospectus, were only 1.1% (with an additional discretionary incentive of 0.5%), instead of the usual 2.5%, and also had to be shared between 26 banks.

In addition, payment of the sponsor fees (which amounted to a grand total of $100,000 per firm on the PSBC offering) and the reimbursement of deal expenses (when allowed) may on occasion be indefinitely held up by some issuers.

On the advisory side, some 60% of the M&A fees in Asia have already gone to Chinese banks in 2016, and it’s not unlikely that a material portion of the balance may yet have to be paid to the international advisers working on such deals, even long after they have been completed.

Dirty little secret

With investment banking activity in southeast Asia at a near standstill, and all the action now systematically coming from China, this dirty little secret increasingly means that printing deals there has for some become little more than a league table game, as has also long been the case in markets like India, Taiwan or Korea.

Add to that Asia ex-Japan, ex-Australia, ex-A share equity issuance currently standing at only about half of that seen for the entire 2015 year (about $83bn compared to $159bn, according to Dealogic), with just 41% of that coming from the more profitable IPOs, and it’s not surprising that a veil of doom and gloom is slowly settling over the region’s ECM desks.

And while there were about 60 or so outstanding new listing application proofs still filed with the Hong Kong exchange as of the end of November, only 8% were by issuers with a net profit after tax of $50m or greater.

But, as the Christmas carol says: let nothing you dismay, let nothing you affright, tidings of comfort and joy perhaps lie ahead (one hopes)!

Happy holidays!

Philippe Espinasse was a capital markets banker for almost 20 years and is now an independent consultant in Hong Kong. He is the author of “IPO: A Global Guide”, “IPO Banks: Pitch, Selection and Mandate”, and of the Hong Kong thrillers “Hard Underwriting” and “The Traveler”.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 08 Dec 2016

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 28.78
2 CITIC Securities 22.01
3 China CITIC Bank Corp 10.16
4 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 7.90
4 Everbright Securities 7.90

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 CITIC Securities 9,844.12 61 5.72%
2 Goldman Sachs 8,917.11 41 5.18%
3 China International Capital Corp Ltd 8,175.96 42 4.75%
4 UBS 7,685.32 56 4.46%
5 Citi 7,312.18 51 4.25%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 27,168.39 180 8.38%
2 Citi 23,134.16 146 7.14%
3 JPMorgan 20,417.69 115 6.30%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 15,766.30 85 4.87%
5 Standard Chartered Bank 14,043.71 105 4.33%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital Asia Regional Capital Market Awards 2017

    GlobalCapital Asia is pleased to invite pitches for our annual regional capital markets and investment banking awards, rewarding the most impressive transactions and investment bank franchises of 2017.

  • GlobalCapital Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards 2017: the Winners

    France, Tennet, NWB and Berlin Hyp are among the green and social bond issuers acclaimed in GlobalCapital's Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards 2017, which were announced on Tuesday in Amsterdam.

  • Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards: the Nominations

    GlobalCapital is happy to announce the nominations for its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards 2017.

  • RMB internationalisation: 10 questions for the market, part 2

    Every year, our sister publication Asiamoney carries out an Offshore RMB Poll. As part of that process, the magazine asks the market for its thoughts on important renminbi topics. In this third year, we received around 2,300 valid responses, up 3% on a year ago. The ten questions included a new one on the inclusion of onshore RMB assets in global indices. Here we present the answers to the final five questions.

  • RMB internationalisation: 10 questions for the market, part 1

    Every year, our sister publication Asiamoney carries out an Offshore RMB Poll. As part of that process, the magazine asks the market for its thoughts on important renminbi topics. In this third year, we received around 2,300 valid responses, up 3% on a year ago. The ten questions included a new one on the inclusion of onshore RMB assets in global indices. Here we present the answers to the first five questions.