Chinese property bonds: still the golden goose?

Investors have mixed feelings about bonds from Chinese property companies, but a likely supply-demand rebalance could signal yet another honeymoon period for the sector.

  • By Addison Gong
  • 09 Oct 2019
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Chinese property bonds are going through a rough period. Concerns around a toughened policy stance from regulators, the overwhelming year-to-date primary supply and broader market sentiment shifts have caused some investors to distance themselves from the sector.

As a result, dollar bonds from China Evergrande Group, Fantasia Holdings Group, Golden Wheel Tiandi Holdings, Modern Land China Co and Xinyuan Real Estate are trading around the low 90s or even well into the 80s in the secondary market. Even lower beta names with investment grade ratings, such as China Jinmao Holdings Group and Sino Ocean Land, have widened by 30bp-50bp in recent weeks.

The sector is also seeing more divergence. The spread differential between single-B and double-B rated names widened to 240bp by the end of September, according to JP Morgan.

In new issues, a shift from a seller’s market to a buyer’s market has forced Beijing Hongkun Weiye Real Estate Development Co, Fujian Yango Group, Helenbergh China Holdings and Zensun Group to offer yields of between 12.5% and 14.75% for relatively short-dated bonds.

The worries and the fatigue are justifiable. Cracks in the Chinese property market are showing amid a moderation in the country’s economic growth. This is as regulators, including the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), tighten the financing environment for the sector both on and offshore, putting refinancing risk back in the spotlight. 

Issuers have raced to raise debt this year in a market that is already oversupplied. Chinese developers collectively printed a record $60bn of dollar bonds during the first nine months of 2019, almost 40% higher than the full-year 2018 issuance from the sector.

Naturally, that excess supply has put investors in dire need of diversification away from property names and, to some extent, Chinese bonds.

But the property bond market is far from broken. Among international deals from the country, real estate is still the most understood — and arguably, the most predictable — sector, and it comes with attractive yields. While the historical spread premium for Asian bonds has compressed over the years, Chinese high yield property bonds that were included in the JP Morgan Asia Credit Index were still trading at least 386bp wide of similarly rated US comparables as of late September, according to the bank’s research desk.

More importantly, a slowdown in the pace of new issues from this quarter is foreseeable. Deal flow has already started to become more disciplined since the NDRC’s move in July to limit the use of proceeds from property bonds to strictly offshore refinancing, triggering a likely rebalance between supply and demand.

Adding to the equation are two other things. Cheap onshore funding conditions this year have kept international issuance from state-owned enterprises and financial institutions largely at bay, while high yield industrial credits and bonds from non-Chinese borrowers have continued to be sporadic.

That, coupled with a similar issuance restriction on local government financing vehicles — another important segment of the dollar bond market in Asia — means investors will likely be willing to take whatever bonds come their way, especially if it’s from a quality name.

As distinctions between the good and the weak credits continue to become clearer, defaults may be inevitable. But investors will also find more buying opportunities — so long as they don’t write off property bonds just yet.

  • By Addison Gong
  • 09 Oct 2019

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 27.09
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 12.86
3 China Merchants Bank Co 11.85
4 China Merchants Securities Co 9.09
5 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 5.51

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $b No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 CITIC Securities 15.74 76 7.79%
2 Goldman Sachs 14.46 60 7.16%
3 China International Capital Corp Ltd 14.21 72 7.03%
4 UBS 12.70 89 6.28%
5 Morgan Stanley 11.11 66 5.50%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $b No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 32.35 286 8.25%
2 Citi 25.59 178 6.53%
3 JPMorgan 18.14 134 4.63%
4 Standard Chartered Bank 18.08 182 4.61%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 15.32 112 3.91%

Asian polls & awards

  • Finance Minister of the Year, CEE

    Djamshid Kuchkarov, Uzbekistan

  • GlobalCapital China Capital Market Awards 2019: open for submissions

    GlobalCapital China is pleased to invite you to participate in the GlobalCapital China Capital Market Awards 2019. Inaugurated last year under the GlobalRMB banner, the awards celebrate the accomplishments of the leading players in the renminbi debt capital markets, onshore and offshore, as well as key service providers.

  • Last chance! GlobalCapital Asia Capital Market Awards 2019

    GlobalCapital Asia is pleased to invite pitches for our annual capital markets and investment banking awards, which reward the most impressive transactions and investment banks of 2019.

  • GlobalCapital reveals SRI Award nominations

    GlobalCapital has published the nominations for its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards. The winners will be announced on September 17, at our Awards Ceremony in Amsterdam.

  • GlobalCapital SRI Awards: poll extended

    In response to requests from market participants, GlobalCapital has extended the closing date of its poll to determine the 2019 winners of its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards. Market participants can now vote until July 26.