HK to board out dodgy directors (well, almost)

In this year’s last Clawback, columnist Philippe Espinasse has his say on corporate governance standards in Hong Kong-listed companies.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 28 Nov 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Perhaps as a teaser for its New Year resolutions, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange recently published the findings of its latest review of listed issuers' corporate governance practices, in addition to updated guidance material on environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting.

As part of this, a new corporate governance code, together with changes to related listing rules, will come into effect on January 1, 2019.

Most of the amendments relate to independent, non-executive directors (also known as INEDs), an often-criticised area of governance for listed companies in the city. The INEDs of some issuers are sometimes thought to be little more than mouthpieces for controlling shareholders.

In particular, greater demand will be imposed on the board and its nomination committee. This is because the circular to shareholders accompanying the resolution to elect an INED will need to include reasons for determining that the candidate can devote sufficient time to his or her duties, if that person will be holding their seventh (or more) listed company directorship.

Although this goes in the right direction, as an INED of a listed company myself (although not in Hong Kong), seven or more board positions for public companies certainly sounds like plenty, and a rather high threshold.

A survey undertaken by Bloomberg in early November found that there are 113 listed companies in Hong Kong (out of almost 1,900 as of the end of October 2018) with directors serving on six or more boards (as compared to 39 companies in New York and only eight in London). One such director even sits on the boards of no fewer than 16 listed companies, in addition to two real estate investment trusts.

One can only marvel at how such directors can find the time to read (let alone understand and, often, also comment on) the hundreds of pages of documents that come across their desks before each meeting as part of the reporting, ratification or discussion items submitted to boards for their members’ consideration.

In line with the times, other changes will require issuers to have a diversity policy and to disclose the policy (or a summary of such policy) in their corporate governance reports. The HKEX says this would make its rules in this respect even stricter than those in most other jurisdictions, including Australia and the UK.

The corporate governance code will also ask issuers to disclose the process used to identify proposed INEDs; the perspectives, skills and experience they can bring to the board; and how they would contribute to diversity of the company’s governance framework.

To strengthen the criteria for the assessment of potential INEDs’ independence, and to align with international practice, the exchange will introduce or extend cooling off periods for candidates with material interests in the issuer’s principal business activities (who, quite frankly probably shouldn’t even be considered as INEDs in the first place), as well as former professional advisers and auditors of the company.

INEDs will also “generally” be required to attend general meetings and meet with the chairman of the company at least annually (one can only wonder that this perhaps does not even happen at some public companies).

In addition, issuers will now be asked to disclose their dividend policies in annual reports.

Lastly, the HKEX has updated its guidance on ESG disclosure, in particular taking into account recent international climate-related disclosure recommendations, and with an emphasis on issuers’ governance structure for ESG reporting.

Good initiatives, but still falling short of excluding controlling shareholders from voting for INEDs, which likely would instantly resolve much of the issues pertaining to the governance of some Hong Kong-listed issuers. But that’s another story.

Philippe Espinasse was a capital markets banker for almost 20 years and is now an independent consultant in Hong Kong. He is the author of “IPO: A Global Guide”, “IPO Banks: Pitch, Selection and Mandate”, and of the Hong Kong thrillers “Hard Underwriting” and “The Traveler”. His new book, “Cornerstone Investors: A practice Guide for Asian IPOs” was published in January 2018.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 28 Nov 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 China Merchants Securities Co 15.31
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 12.35
3 CITIC Securities 8.92
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 7.60
5 China CITIC Bank Corp 6.76

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 17,772.74 86 7.66%
2 Morgan Stanley 14,624.46 73 6.30%
3 Citi 14,373.60 98 6.19%
4 UBS 13,054.43 87 5.62%
5 China International Capital Corp Ltd 11,749.13 49 5.06%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 26,480.74 228 7.82%
2 Citi 23,876.05 159 7.05%
3 JPMorgan 15,475.44 97 4.57%
4 Goldman Sachs 13,893.80 68 4.10%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 13,756.20 87 4.06%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2018.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Bonds

    In part three of our results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best Local Currency Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the debut winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Equities

    In part two of our results announcements, we reveal the winning equity deals and banks, including the Best Follow-on/Accelerated Bookbuild, Best Equity-Linked Deal, Best IPO, Best ECM Deal and Best ECM House.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Loans

    GlobalCapital Asia has spent the last two months talking to banks and their clients in a bid to determine the most impressive capital markets transactions and advisers across Asia ex-Japan in 2018. We are pleased to begin our awards announcements in the loan market.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Most impressive issuers, best law firm

    In this third part of the GlobalRMB awards, we present our reasons for choosing the best issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories — and praise the strong performance of one well-known foreign law firm.