HKEX is unlikely to lose ground to SGX

The Singapore Exchange is firing shots at the Hong Kong Stock Exchange once again to lure IPO-hopefuls, this time over the city’s ever closer political relationship with China. But Hong Kong can boast some clear advantages over its rival.

  • By Jonathan Breen
  • 13 Mar 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

When promoting the SGX last week, its head of equities and fixed income Chew Sutat made a point of highlighting that Singapore is not China. His pitch for firms looking to list is clear: Singapore is a good listing alternative for Chinese and Hong Kong companies because it is not China and so not under its thumb.

His argument comes at a time of increasing political tensions between Hong Kong and the mainland, which some market watchers fear is threatening the legal independence and semi-autonomous relationship that has made the city so attractive to international finance. If things get rocky, it would only be natural for firms to look at other avenues to raise new equity.

But it’s not quite that clear-cut as saying that political tensions and pressure from Beijing are good or bad for the Hong Kong ECM market. There are elements of both.

For starters, Hong Kong’s value proposition is not going to change and it will remain a huge draw for Chinese issuers, particularly those looking to do business across the border. The bourse has repeatedly been among the busiest IPO markets in the world, offering a vast investor base and increasing access to Chinese capital. It has also firmly cemented its status as Asia’s financial hub.

Singapore, in comparison, is a much smaller market. It has been the hub for Asean issuers and the de facto home for real estate investment trust IPOs, but it needs more primary equity business. Lack of chunky deals in primary has made secondary trading volumes on the exchange lacklustre — a frequent complaint among ECM bankers. So it makes sense that it is trying to attract Chinese companies that have largely been heading to Hong Kong or New York to list.

SGX already has a number of Chinese firms listed on its bourse, known as S-chip stocks. But the majority of those names listed nearly a decade ago. And in recent years the trend has reversed, with an increasing number of S-chips de-listing. The bourse has also had trouble winning over local issuers, such as gaming company Razer, which last year opted to leave its home market and list on the HKEX.

Unsurprisingly, the SGX has been criticised for not having a clear game plan. But it has been upping its game, taking a big step forward last year when it passed a proposition to allow dual-class shares — a favourite with technology firms that like to keep control over their long term vision.

That, however, is unlikely to much make much of a difference.

The HKEX has matched the move and will also start allowing dual-class share structures from later this year. The proposal is expected to not only attract new economy companies from the mainland, but is also targeted at getting Chinese champions such as e-commerce firm Alibaba Group Holdings, which is listed in the US, to have a secondary listing in Hong Kong.  

China itself is keen to host technology IPOs, with local publication Caixin saying at the start of March that the regulators may allow offshore Chinese listed companies to sell depositary receipts in the mainland — heating up competition between the bourses.

Where Hong Kong’s status could begin to suffer, however, is on the buy-side. If China becomes more involved in the city and the local market, investors are likely to grow wary about protection. There are already doubts, for example, over whether a Chinese state-linked company would be held accountable for any digression in the same way as other listed firms in Hong Kong, leaving the fate of investors tied to political influence. That is still far-fetched, of course, but the fact that concerns are already building suggests how closely investors are watching developments between the city and China.

In the short term, the competition may be on but Singapore needs to change its tack if it wants to attract more business to its primary market, as the appeal of a Hong Kong listing is not going to fade anytime soon.

The HKEX can probably rest easy — the Lion City is unlikely to roar just yet.

  • By Jonathan Breen
  • 13 Mar 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 China Merchants Securities Co 19.83
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 14.01
3 CITIC Securities 11.86
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 10.78
5 China CITIC Bank Corp 9.70

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 15,358.51 68 8.04%
2 Morgan Stanley 12,834.37 54 6.72%
3 Citi 12,320.61 78 6.45%
4 UBS 9,710.87 63 5.08%
5 China International Capital Corp Ltd 9,472.18 34 4.96%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 19,148.80 161 7.35%
2 Citi 19,111.99 121 7.34%
3 JPMorgan 12,650.91 74 4.86%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 11,915.50 74 4.58%
5 Goldman Sachs 10,514.07 49 4.04%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalRMB's best bank for securities services: Standard Chartered

    Securities services was one of the most competitive award categories GlobalRMB had to decide this year. Our awards criteria demanded the near-impossible from participating banks: to beat the competition in the fast-changing China access scheme, while at the same time demonstrating a broad client base and the ability to be at the cutting edge of innovation.

  • China DCM Best Bank Awards: ABS, CNH, G3 and Panda bonds

    In GlobalRMB's Best Bank Awards for China DCM, Standard Chartered wins for ABS and CNH, HSBC takes home the G3 Bond House Award, and Bank of China gets kudos as the Best House for Panda bond issuers.

  • Now open! GlobalCapital Asia Capital Market Awards 2018

    GlobalCapital Asia is pleased to invite pitches for our annual capital markets and investment banking awards, rewarding the most impressive transactions and investment banks of 2018.

  • SRI Award Winners 2018 revealed

    GlobalCapital announced the winners of its Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards 2018 in Amsterdam on Tuesday evening. This year’s two sovereign debut green finance issues, from Indonesia and Belgium, won Deals of the Year in their regions, and there were double laurels for Danone, in both the bond and loan markets.

  • The results are in! GlobalRMB announces award winners

    GlobalRMB is pleased to announce the winners of its inaugural awards, honouring those banks, companies and individuals that have made the biggest contribution to bridging the gap between China and the rest of the world.