Dim sum bonds: here today, gone tomorrow

China’s offshore renminbi bond market has made a strong start to the year, with two foreign issuers already selling dim sum notes. The signs for a robust 2018 are there but the market’s return to form will be contingent on more than just issuer interest.

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 16 Jan 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Australia’s Westpac Banking Corp threw open the dim sum market last week when it sold a Rmb500m ($77m) three year bond. India’s IL&FS Transportation Networks quickly followed suit, sealing a Rmb900m 2021.

The offshore renminbi market could not have had a better beginning to the new year. The involvement of two foreign issuers within the first two weeks of January is a boon and will allow dim sums to build, and hopefully flourish, without hindrance from China's ever-watchful regulators. It is clear that for the dim sum market to survive in the long term, it needs to attract issuers from outside of the mainland that are looking at renminbi for more than just scoring political points with the Beijing government.

IL&FS’s sale was particularly notable as it was the first high yield dim sum in 16 months.

Last year, just 14 public offshore renminbi deals (including Formosa bonds, or RMB bonds issued in Taiwan) worth Rmb25.06bn were sold, according to GlobalRMB data. Three of those trades came from corporate issuers and none of them were sub-investment grade.

Needless to say, the dim sum market cannot be one just for investment grade credits, or the majority financial ones at that. Such a market would rule out many of Asia’s issuers and offer little yield — or appeal — to investors, putting the market on a road to nowhere.

IL&FS’s success could be the opening high yield issuers have been waiting for before they try a similar transaction. Such a knock-on effect could drive more demand from investors, attracted to the yield opportunities.

For dim sum, market conditions are everything. In 2017, only four offshore renminbi deals were publicly sold in the first half, while seven were sold in the last quarter. IL&FS first approached investors during a non-deal roadshow in September, but found little interest at the time. But by the end of September, the market began to shift in favour of the offshore market, as yields on onshore bonds crept higher than offshore as a result of the Chinese regulators’ deleveraging push. Appealing cross-currency swap rates also allowed issuers to grab cheaper deals than in dollars.

While many have said that onshore renminbi Panda bonds are affecting dim sum issuance, the market conditions are right for tables to turn. Last week, bankers on the IL&FS trade saw a 50bp-100bp advantage to issuing renminbi notes offshore versus a potential onshore outing. On Friday, Mitsubishi UFG Financial Group sold a Rmb1bn 5.3% 2021 onshore Panda bond, while Mizuho Bank sold a Rmb500m 5.3% 2021 Panda. In contrast, Westpac’s offshore 2021s offered a lower coupon of 4.35%. The Australian bank is rated Aa3/AA-, while MUFG is rated A1/A-/A and Mizuho A1/A-/A-.

Bankers on the dim sum trades also noted the accommodative swap rates for issuers to switch to dollars if they so wished. The swap rate was similarly cited as an appeal for dim sum issuers hitting the market late last year, many of which were dubbed opportunistic trades.

But it is not clear how long that attraction will last. The three year cross-currency swap rate was cited at 4.05% when Westpac priced, already higher than the sub-4% levels of last year.

A shift in onshore yields or cross-currency swap rates could quickly cool issuance. Sure, more issuers could take advantage of the opportunity now, but be ready for the interest to shift back to the onshore market — or away from renminbi as a funding currency altogether — just as fast. 

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 16 Jan 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 18.86
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 14.39
3 China Merchants Bank Co 14.21
4 China Merchants Securities Co 8.85
5 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 5.90

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $bn No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 China International Capital Corp Ltd 4.57 22 14.06%
2 China Securities Co Ltd 3.53 7 10.85%
3 Morgan Stanley 3.39 11 10.42%
4 CITIC Securities 2.99 10 9.20%
5 Citi 1.66 11 5.10%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $bn No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 6.43 34 8.09%
2 HSBC 5.38 42 6.77%
3 BofA Securities 4.08 13 5.13%
4 UBS 3.91 21 4.92%
5 JPMorgan 3.87 23 4.88%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital China 2019 awards winners: Part III

    In the final part of GlobalCapital China’s awards announcement, we discuss the key innovation of 2019, and reveal the individual that has made the greatest contribution to reforming and internationalising the Chinese onshore market.

  • GlobalCapital China 2019 awards winners: Part II

    In the second part of GlobalCapital China’s awards announcement, we reveal the winning banks across Panda bonds, G3 bonds and ABS, as well as the best bank for securities services and the most impressive law firm.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2019: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out which firms have been named the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2019.

  • GlobalCapital China announces 2019 awards winners: Part I

    GlobalCapital China, previously GlobalRMB, is pleased to announce the winners of its annual capital markets awards, honouring the banks, companies and individuals that have made the biggest contribution to bridging the gap between China’s markets and the rest of the world. In part one of the awards, we reveal the most impressive issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2019: Bonds

    In part three of GlobalCapital Asia's awards results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.