RBI longer-dated debt gambit pays off

When the Reserve Bank of India brought in guidelines that forced borrowers to hedge shorter-dated debt in a bid to encourage longer-term financing, it was met with an outcry about the feasibility of such a plan. But now that Power Finance Corp is out for a 10 year borrowing and set to receive a strong reception, it appears the central bank’s tough stance is paying off.

  • By Shruti Chaturvedi
  • 14 Mar 2017
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

The state-owned company is looking for $100m-equivalent borrowing in euros, along with an additional $150m-equivalent through a greenshoe option.

Its latest request follows an attempt at a fundraising in 2016 that market sources said was scrapped because of mandatory hedging requirements.

The RBI has a labyrinthine set of rules governing offshore financing. The relevant one in this situation is that non-bank financial companies (NBFCs), infrastructure firms and those that support them are eligible to raise minimum five year foreign currency loans but on the condition that they are fully hedged.

GCAsia_cartoon_1496_RBIview_300pxThe additional cost of hedging diluted the benefit of raising a dollar-denominated loan to such an extent that it made more sense for PFC to stick to local options, sources said at the time.

This time around, it has approached banks under track II of the Reserve Bank of India's guidelines on external debt, which allows NBFCs and infrastructure firms to issue debt with a minimum maturity of 10 years, most importantly with no mandatory hedging. However, Indian banks are not allowed to provide any of the funds.

Asset-liability mismatch

When the rules were introduced at the end of 2015, they were greeted with the usual scepticism about whether foreign lenders would have appetite for a loan that requires taking a 10 year view on Indian infrastructure-related firms.

But now that a request for proposals has been issued, several banks that GlobalCapital Asia spoke to were open to the idea.

After all, PFC finances power projects and often borrows for the purpose of lending on. Because infrastructure projects typically take a longer than the conservative five year bank loan time-frame to become viable and generate steady cashflows, a lot of PFC’s previous, shorter tenor financings would inevitably end up getting refinanced for another three to five years.

To minimise asset-liability mismatches, longer-dated debt makes more sense. In this case, the amount PFC is seeking is not particularly large and because it is looking for euros, bankers reckon it should be able to get funds at very competitive pricing, notwithstanding the tenor.

Though the loan has a bullet repayment, on an average basis, PFC will have to set aside a smaller amount to service the loan because of the longer time period than it would in case of shorter-dated debt. This will help it smooth out cash flows.

Of course lenders will no longer have the option of exiting after five years, or repricing the deal according to prevalent market conditions. But in a market environment where there is plenty of liquidity and relatively few high grade options to put money to work, banks are learning to adapt their requirements, be it on tenors, pricing or even covenants.

The initial resistance was understandable, especially as the RBI does not have the best track record when it comes to introducing regulations for overseas debt. But by making 10 year debt a more cost effective funding option than five years, the central bank has created a market for longer-dated bank loans to Indian companies. 

And while it will take a few strong names like PFC to open up and establish the framework, once banks start becoming more comfortable with the idea, private companies could follow suit. Talk about hedging your bets. 

  • By Shruti Chaturvedi
  • 14 Mar 2017

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 CITIC Securities 30.19
2 China CITIC Bank Corp 12.38
3 Bank of China (BOC) 11.61
4 Everbright Securities 10.84
5 China Merchants Bank Co 10.06

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 CITIC Securities 8,182.39 47 5.54%
2 Goldman Sachs 7,986.29 34 5.41%
3 China International Capital Corp Ltd 7,824.36 37 5.30%
4 UBS 6,615.59 48 4.48%
5 Citi 6,126.08 41 4.15%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 23,832.57 153 8.87%
2 Citi 19,769.11 126 7.36%
3 JPMorgan 16,559.75 94 6.17%
4 Standard Chartered Bank 12,715.21 93 4.73%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 11,943.66 69 4.45%

Asian polls & awards

  • RMB internationalisation: 10 questions for the market, part 2

    Every year, our sister publication Asiamoney carries out an Offshore RMB Poll. As part of that process, the magazine asks the market for its thoughts on important renminbi topics. In this third year, we received around 2,300 valid responses, up 3% on a year ago. The ten questions included a new one on the inclusion of onshore RMB assets in global indices. Here we present the answers to the final five questions.

  • RMB internationalisation: 10 questions for the market, part 1

    Every year, our sister publication Asiamoney carries out an Offshore RMB Poll. As part of that process, the magazine asks the market for its thoughts on important renminbi topics. In this third year, we received around 2,300 valid responses, up 3% on a year ago. The ten questions included a new one on the inclusion of onshore RMB assets in global indices. Here we present the answers to the first five questions.

  • Made in China: The best banks and deals of 2016

    You know who won, now find out why. GlobalCapital Asia and Asiamoney present the extended results of our 2016 China Deals and Investment Bank of the Year awards, recognising achievement both on and offshore.

  • Asia’s standout deals

    GlobalCapital Asia and Asiamoney present the extended results for our 2016 Best Country Deals. Discover why these bond, equity and loan transactions delivered outstanding outcomes for issuers and investors.

  • Aussie award winners: The best banks and deals of 2016

    The names have been announced, now find out why they stood out from the crowd. GlobalCapital Asia and Asiamoney present the extended results for our 2016 Australia Deals and Investment Bank of the Year awards, recognising achievement in equities, bonds, loans and investment banking.