Pulled deals: a warning sign for Asian bonds

The Asian bond market has been red hot since the start of 2020. With nearly every day bringing a number of blowout deals, it would be easy to overlook the three borrowers that have fallen short of completing their proposed transactions. But the failed deals may be a sign of things to come.

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 21 Jan 2020
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

January's market boom has been helped by a buoyant global backdrop, with international problems like those between the US and Iran having quite a muted impact on investors. In Asia, the flurry of deals was boosted by the early Chinese New Year, set to begin on January 25. Chinese issuers have rushed offshore to fund before the lengthy holiday break, and investors with fresh new year cash to put to work have eaten up the new offerings.

The old saying tells us "as goes January, so goes the year," but it seems very unlikely that the heightened volume of international bonds and support from insatiable investors will carry on apace. Just look at the three borrowers that have already had deals pulled this year— India's Lalitpur Power Generation Co, Chinese industrial company China ZhengTong Auto Services Holdings and Vietnam's Southeast Asia Commercial Joint Stock Bank.

In the span of just over a week, all three would-be inaugural borrowers met resistance from investors. Each came from a different country and sector, but each faced a disconnect between what the issuers were willing to pay and what investors wanted. It's easy to pass off one or the other with various excuses — China's industrial sector has been trading poorly, for instance — but there is more to it than that.

The failure of these transactions is a testament to the skill and care still needed to execute deals. Despite widespread investor enthusiasm, this isn't a market where anything will stick. Investors are still cautious about taking on new risk, especially if it doesn't come at a generous price. This will only become more evident as the year continues and investors move beyond the new year rush.

Last year, investors absorbed a $300m debut from Vietnam Prosperity Joint Stock Commercial Bank against a weaker backdrop than that of recent weeks. Likewise, other South and Southeast Asian power companies have closed new bonds this month. It should raise questions, then, as to why the three would-be borrowers fell short of their bond aspirations, and why investors were so willing to move on to one of the many other dollar deals in the market last week.

China ZhengTong Auto returned to the dollar market a few days after it was forced to postpone its deal, this time pricing a $160m two year bond. But the change in the borrower's approach to the trade was obvious. While it had leaned on JP Morgan as the sole lead for the initial sale, it later returned with China Citic Bank International, China Construction Bank International and Haitong International supporting JP Morgan as fellow global co-ordinators. One can assume that these Chinese banks were able to use their balance sheets to push the transaction to completion.

That approach to execution is not uncommon for Chinese issuers, and is often deployed as the market becomes tougher. It seems likely that we can expect more such executions as the year progresses.

There is no reason for panic. The occasional pulled deal should be considered a good thing for the market. A primary market that goes without any pulled deals is likely to be erring on the side of caution, which is not desirable for a region like Asia that has plenty of debut borrowers from new countries and sectors in need of offshore funding. Banks have to take calculated risks; sometimes those risks backfire.

But the fact that three deals were postponed during such a short timeframe this month should raise a few eyebrows. Debut dollar trades are rarely a slam dunk, and the blowout January market should not give bankers or borrowers a false sense of security. The post-Chinese New Year market is going to bring its own waves of change. Asian borrowers should be ready for a bumpy ride.

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 21 Jan 2020

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 18.86
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 14.39
3 China Merchants Bank Co 14.21
4 China Merchants Securities Co 8.85
5 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 5.90

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $bn No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 China International Capital Corp Ltd 4.57 23 12.74%
2 China Securities Co Ltd 3.53 7 9.84%
3 Morgan Stanley 3.39 11 9.44%
4 CITIC Securities 3.29 11 9.18%
5 Goldman Sachs 1.70 13 4.75%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $bn No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 7.00 39 7.75%
2 HSBC 5.95 51 6.59%
3 UBS 4.45 28 4.93%
4 BofA Securities 4.36 17 4.82%
5 JPMorgan 4.08 27 4.52%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital China 2019 awards winners: Part III

    In the final part of GlobalCapital China’s awards announcement, we discuss the key innovation of 2019, and reveal the individual that has made the greatest contribution to reforming and internationalising the Chinese onshore market.

  • GlobalCapital China 2019 awards winners: Part II

    In the second part of GlobalCapital China’s awards announcement, we reveal the winning banks across Panda bonds, G3 bonds and ABS, as well as the best bank for securities services and the most impressive law firm.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2019: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out which firms have been named the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2019.

  • GlobalCapital China announces 2019 awards winners: Part I

    GlobalCapital China, previously GlobalRMB, is pleased to announce the winners of its annual capital markets awards, honouring the banks, companies and individuals that have made the biggest contribution to bridging the gap between China’s markets and the rest of the world. In part one of the awards, we reveal the most impressive issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2019: Bonds

    In part three of GlobalCapital Asia's awards results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.