IndInfravit success is no silver bullet for InvIT market

India’s latest infrastructure investment trust listing, or InvIT, was a success by most accounts, raising Rp32bn ($484m) for IndInfravit Trust. But the lack of liquidity in the secondary market has exposed it as a hollow victory. More needs to be done if the asset class is to become a viable fundraising tool.

  • By John Loh
  • 15 May 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

IndInfravit, a unit of Indian conglomerate Larsen & Toubro, listed India’s third InvIT last week. It opted for a private placement that skipped high net worth investors in favour of a direct sale to institutional accounts.

The issuer had good reasons for doing so. Wealthy investors are no longer keen on InvITs as the asset class continues to underperform. At the time of writing, IRB InvIT Fund and India Grid Trust, the only listed infrastructure trusts, were still trading below their IPO prices.

That prompted IndInfravit and bookrunners Citi and ICICI Securities to take a different approach. Instead of a regular public bookbuild, they sold a majority of the units to Germany’s Allianz Capital Partners and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, which became anchor investors for 55% of the flotation.

But while IndInfravit achieved its fundraising goals, the use of the private placement is clearly no silver bullet for the InvIT market.

Not a single unit was traded on IndInfravit’s debut last Wednesday, and activity remained thin in the days that followed. This was, of course, the expected result, since the units were placed only with long-term investors. The lack of any retail accounts in the book led to the sharp drop-off in liquidity.

Oxymoronic

As a yield instrument, it could be argued that InvITs should trade like fixed income rather than equity. But to have daily turnover of less than 1%, as has been the case with IndInfravit, seems untenable. The regulator may need to rethink its position of barring retail investors from participating in InvITs.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has its own reasons for locking out mom-and-pop investors from the market, but as long as this is the case, the long-term development of InvITs will be hampered and they will struggle to gain wider acceptance.

If InvITs remain illiquid instruments with prices that barely budge, then they are no better than private market transactions and might as well have stayed private. Calling them “listings” is an oxymoron.

The current model works if issuers want to be “one-and-done” trades, a term for companies that raise funds at the point of listing and never tap the market again.

But this is a pity considering India’s vast infrastructure funding needs, and the ability of listings to provide an additional channel of financing to shift financial risk — and burden — away from the banking sector, bond investors and the government. It is a tremendous missed opportunity.

The trajectory of India’s nascent InvITs have been troubled so far, but it does not have to stay that way. Their potential stretches father than the country’s highways. But the fundraising model needs retooling. It is time to take another look. 

  • By John Loh
  • 15 May 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 China Merchants Securities Co 18.01
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 15.02
3 CITIC Securities 10.77
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 9.79
5 China CITIC Bank Corp 8.81

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 15,658.50 72 7.68%
2 Morgan Stanley 13,801.54 62 6.77%
3 Citi 13,609.47 87 6.67%
4 UBS 10,792.88 67 5.29%
5 China International Capital Corp Ltd 10,501.97 40 5.15%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 20,547.73 174 7.46%
2 Citi 20,227.76 130 7.35%
3 JPMorgan 13,591.21 83 4.94%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 12,328.25 77 4.48%
5 Goldman Sachs 11,208.75 54 4.07%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalRMB awards: Most impressive issuers, best law firm

    In this third part of the GlobalRMB awards, we present our reasons for choosing the best issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories — and praise the strong performance of one well-known foreign law firm.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Person of the year, most impressive innovation

    In the final article on our GlobalRMB awards, we talk about the key innovation of the year and highlight the individual that has made the greatest contribution to the development of China’s cross-border capital markets.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Best bank for securities services

    Securities services was one of the most competitive award categories GlobalRMB had to decide this year. Our awards criteria demanded the near-impossible from participating banks: to beat the competition in the fast-changing China access scheme, while at the same time demonstrating a broad client base and the ability to be at the cutting edge of innovation.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Best for ABS, CNH, G3 and Panda bonds

    In GlobalRMB's Best Bank Awards for China DCM, Standard Chartered wins for ABS and CNH, HSBC takes home the G3 Bond House Award, and Bank of China gets kudos as the Best House for Panda bond issuers.

  • Now open! GlobalCapital Asia Capital Market Awards 2018

    GlobalCapital Asia is pleased to invite pitches for our annual capital markets and investment banking awards, rewarding the most impressive transactions and investment banks of 2018.