IndInfravit success is no silver bullet for InvIT market

India’s latest infrastructure investment trust listing, or InvIT, was a success by most accounts, raising Rp32bn ($484m) for IndInfravit Trust. But the lack of liquidity in the secondary market has exposed it as a hollow victory. More needs to be done if the asset class is to become a viable fundraising tool.

  • By John Loh
  • 15 May 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

IndInfravit, a unit of Indian conglomerate Larsen & Toubro, listed India’s third InvIT last week. It opted for a private placement that skipped high net worth investors in favour of a direct sale to institutional accounts.

The issuer had good reasons for doing so. Wealthy investors are no longer keen on InvITs as the asset class continues to underperform. At the time of writing, IRB InvIT Fund and India Grid Trust, the only listed infrastructure trusts, were still trading below their IPO prices.

That prompted IndInfravit and bookrunners Citi and ICICI Securities to take a different approach. Instead of a regular public bookbuild, they sold a majority of the units to Germany’s Allianz Capital Partners and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, which became anchor investors for 55% of the flotation.

But while IndInfravit achieved its fundraising goals, the use of the private placement is clearly no silver bullet for the InvIT market.

Not a single unit was traded on IndInfravit’s debut last Wednesday, and activity remained thin in the days that followed. This was, of course, the expected result, since the units were placed only with long-term investors. The lack of any retail accounts in the book led to the sharp drop-off in liquidity.

Oxymoronic

As a yield instrument, it could be argued that InvITs should trade like fixed income rather than equity. But to have daily turnover of less than 1%, as has been the case with IndInfravit, seems untenable. The regulator may need to rethink its position of barring retail investors from participating in InvITs.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has its own reasons for locking out mom-and-pop investors from the market, but as long as this is the case, the long-term development of InvITs will be hampered and they will struggle to gain wider acceptance.

If InvITs remain illiquid instruments with prices that barely budge, then they are no better than private market transactions and might as well have stayed private. Calling them “listings” is an oxymoron.

The current model works if issuers want to be “one-and-done” trades, a term for companies that raise funds at the point of listing and never tap the market again.

But this is a pity considering India’s vast infrastructure funding needs, and the ability of listings to provide an additional channel of financing to shift financial risk — and burden — away from the banking sector, bond investors and the government. It is a tremendous missed opportunity.

The trajectory of India’s nascent InvITs have been troubled so far, but it does not have to stay that way. Their potential stretches father than the country’s highways. But the fundraising model needs retooling. It is time to take another look. 

  • By John Loh
  • 15 May 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 China Merchants Securities Co 26.40
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 20.00
3 China Securities 13.33
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 12.00
5 Bank of China (BOC) 11.33

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 CITIC Securities 6,126.98 28 9.16%
2 Goldman Sachs 5,830.12 20 8.72%
3 Morgan Stanley 4,329.51 27 6.48%
4 China International Capital Corp Ltd 3,921.06 17 5.86%
5 UBS 3,727.37 21 5.58%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 12,570.23 112 8.45%
2 JPMorgan 9,000.86 54 6.05%
3 Citi 8,900.47 66 5.98%
4 Credit Suisse 5,860.46 43 3.94%
5 Standard Chartered Bank 5,747.27 53 3.86%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2018.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Bonds

    In part three of our results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best Local Currency Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the debut winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Equities

    In part two of our results announcements, we reveal the winning equity deals and banks, including the Best Follow-on/Accelerated Bookbuild, Best Equity-Linked Deal, Best IPO, Best ECM Deal and Best ECM House.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Loans

    GlobalCapital Asia has spent the last two months talking to banks and their clients in a bid to determine the most impressive capital markets transactions and advisers across Asia ex-Japan in 2018. We are pleased to begin our awards announcements in the loan market.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Most impressive issuers, best law firm

    In this third part of the GlobalRMB awards, we present our reasons for choosing the best issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories — and praise the strong performance of one well-known foreign law firm.