When South Korea and Taiwan joined it in 1989, the fledgling Morgan Stanley Capital International emerging markets index was regarded as a ground-breaking instrument that allowed foreign institutional investors to channel funds to smaller markets that were trying to make the transition from backwaters to thriving economies. Sixteen years later, an intense debate is raging over whether MSCI's classifications should change to reflect the economic progress made by Taiwan and South Korea. Market participants and the Korea and Taiwan governments have lobbied MSCI and FTSE for an upgrade, so far unsuccessfully, to developed-market status, arguing that their share markets have grown up and the climate for foreign investors is vastly improved. "It's a tremendously hot topic," concedes Deborah Yang, vice-president at MSCI in Hong Kong. "There are benefits to an emerging market country to being promoted." The promotion of an emerging market to developed-market status could trigger a huge inflow of funds to South Korea's and Taiwan's markets because it would allow a much broader universe of investors to access those markets. Some pension funds in the United States, Europe and elsewhere are currently banned from investing in emerging markets. MSCI is the market leader, especially in the U.S., where it argues that 93% of equity funds are benchmarked to its indices, and Yang says US$1 trillion of passive institutional funds is benchmarked to MSCI Indices globally.
September 01, 2005