Asia’s bond transparency: a laudable step

The decision by bond syndicates in Asia to reveal their orders for new deals will be a clear step forward for the market — but only if the practice becomes widespread.

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 21 May 2019
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Last week bond bankers in Asia began revealing exactly how much they are contributing in orders to new issues. They previously acknowledged that order books “included joint lead manager interest”, but are now explicitly laying out the portion of the books made up by lead banks. The move should be lauded as a big step forward for transparency in the region and its potential to keep banks in check, but it remains to be seen how far banks will let the practice go.

The change came after the International Capital Market Association’s Asia Pacific Bond Syndicate Forum earlier this month pushed for more transparency during book building. While lead managers have indicated in the past when their own orders make up part of a book, they have never disclosed the amount of the orders. That led outside investors to speculate about how much of a deal the leads took.

The move to lay out explicitly the amount of bookrunner orders is, of course, a strong step forward for the Asian market and an excellent “best practice” to encourage. Transparency has long been bandied about as both a demand by market participants and an initiative by the Chinese regulators to make its market more appealing to outsiders.

But while the Chinese market has become more transparent in some ways, parts are still fairly opaque — particularly for outsiders. The result has often been a Chinese market for Chinese borrowers and banks, with little leeway for being truly international.

The sign that such disclosures are necessary for Asian bond sales shows how much Asian borrowers rely on bookrunner orders, and how common these orders have become as a tool for getting banks a mandate. Investors would not be clamouring for such transparency if they didn’t fear how much issuers are relying on banks to boost their books. That in itself isn’t a good sign for the stability or maturity of the market.

But having banks reveal their orders may cut back on this. The transparency will not only help investors gauge the real make-up of an order book, it will also keep the lead managers in check, discouraging them from putting too much into a new issue. After all, bookrunners don’t want to have to explain to investors why half the order book or more has come from the leads themselves.

Don’t get too excited, however. Being just a “best practice” for Asian banks, and not something formal from a regulator, limits the scope of the new efforts. Banks will need to encourage each other to disclose orders accurately, as it will prove easy for leads either to fudge the numbers or not to reveal their interest. It seems at this point the large international houses, which tend to follow ICMA guidelines the most closely, are the most concerned about the disclosures. Some banks may refrain from accurate disclosures when it suits them.

On May 15, for instance, two local government financing vehicles priced dollar bonds. One deal, from a debut name, was led entirely by Chinese banks. It did not disclose the lead bank interest in the transaction nor did it unveil the final deal statistics. The other LGFV trade, which was led by global co-ordinators CEB International, Industrial Bank Hong Kong branch and Standard Chartered, as well as four Chinese bookrunners and lead managers, did disclose the lead manager orders — $530m on a $1.6bn book at reoffer.

The potential for this new move is significant, and could greatly change the way transactions are run in Asia. But it’s still early days and the market is yet to see the longevity of the initiative during a more difficult market, or the consistent participation of banks. If lead managers embrace this practice as they should, Asia’s capital markets will only be better for it.

  • By Morgan Davis
  • 21 May 2019

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Bank of China (BOC) 23.98
2 China Merchants Securities Co 16.10
3 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 13.41
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 9.76
5 China Securities 8.13

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 CITIC Securities 8,322.47 36 8.67%
2 Goldman Sachs 7,626.77 29 7.95%
3 China International Capital Corp Ltd 5,848.43 34 6.09%
4 Morgan Stanley 5,453.25 37 5.68%
5 UBS 5,301.00 38 5.52%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 16,535.56 146 8.20%
2 Citi 11,568.29 94 5.73%
3 JPMorgan 11,150.73 75 5.53%
4 Standard Chartered Bank 7,774.81 79 3.85%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 7,143.11 58 3.54%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Investment banks

    In the fourth and final instalment of GlobalCapital Asia’s capital markets awards announcements, find out the Best Asian Investment Bank and the Best Investment Bank in the region for 2018.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Bonds

    In part three of our results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best Local Currency Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the debut winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Equities

    In part two of our results announcements, we reveal the winning equity deals and banks, including the Best Follow-on/Accelerated Bookbuild, Best Equity-Linked Deal, Best IPO, Best ECM Deal and Best ECM House.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Loans

    GlobalCapital Asia has spent the last two months talking to banks and their clients in a bid to determine the most impressive capital markets transactions and advisers across Asia ex-Japan in 2018. We are pleased to begin our awards announcements in the loan market.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Most impressive issuers, best law firm

    In this third part of the GlobalRMB awards, we present our reasons for choosing the best issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories — and praise the strong performance of one well-known foreign law firm.