No Va Land shows CB hybrids are worth a shot

Vietnamese real estate developer No Va Land Investment Group pulled off the combined sale of a convertible bond and top-up share placement last week. The success of the hybrid fundraising structure means other potential issuers in the region should give it a close look.

  • By Jonathan Breen
  • 24 Apr 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

The equity-linked bond market in Asia has gathered pace this year. So far in 2018, there have been 28 bonds over $100m printed in Asia ex-Japan, half of which were in China’s A-share market, according to Dealogic data. That figure is up from just seven transactions in the same period last year, of which only three were outside of China.

When property developer No Va Land ventured down the path of raising capital through an equity-linked and share sale combination last week, it only took things up a notch in the region’s equity capital markets. With its first ECM deal since listing on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange in December 2016, No Va Land raised around $314m — $160m from a five year non-call three CB and D3.5tr ($153.7m) through a top-up placement of primary shares.

A growing number of companies are now said to be looking at raising capital through a combined equity-linked and share sale.

It is hard to blame them. There are many benefits to this method of fundraising. A convertible is typically cheaper than traditional debt as the cash interest payment is lower, while if the notes are converted into equity, the issuer’s debt is wiped out. Selling new shares is also straightforward enough, as issuers can capitalise on a rally in their stock price and new investors can be enticed with a tasty discount.

If a company like No Va Land, less known to equity investors, tries to raise a large amount from one or the other product, there can be numerous challenges. For example, there is a smaller pool of investors looking at the equity-linked market, while a top-up placement can disgruntle existing shareholders because they are faced with a dilution to their positions. The problem of dilution ultimately follows the redemption of a CB, too.

That’s where a combined convertible and top-up approach can go some way to alleviating these problems. Less of the fundraising relies on a relatively smaller investor base. Stock dilution, meanwhile, is spread over the short and long term, which could help existing shareholders accept the immediate impact, particularly if they expect the company to use the capital raised to fund growth. The structure also helps optimise pricing, as companies may struggle to raise a meaningful amount from just equity or a CB.

The approach has already been tested in Asia to much success. Chinese real estate firm Country Garden Holdings is the only other issuer in the Asia ex-Japan region to take advantage of a CB and top-up approach this year, raising HK$23.5bn ($3bn) in January. Last year, companies such as Hong Kong-listed Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp and Thailand’s Singha Estate used a placement/CB combo to raise funds.

No Va Land is a special case. Its deal is the first equity-linked bond in Vietnam in six years, breaking the lull that persisted since local conglomerate Vingroup sold a $115m five year in 2012, according to Dealogic data.

Given that the country’s equity-linked market has long been quiet, bankers do not expect a revival in issuance from Vietnam. But No Va Land’s deal should reassure other issuers in the region that are looking to tap the equity markets that a similar combination of fundraising is possible.

Talks around more of such issuance are starting to happen in Asia. It’s time to turn the words into action.

  • By Jonathan Breen
  • 24 Apr 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 China Merchants Securities Co 17.33
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 14.45
3 CITIC Securities 10.36
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 9.42
5 China CITIC Bank Corp 8.48

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 15,658.50 72 7.61%
2 Morgan Stanley 13,921.33 63 6.77%
3 Citi 13,640.97 88 6.63%
4 UBS 10,915.56 69 5.31%
5 China International Capital Corp Ltd 10,581.88 41 5.15%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 21,505.44 181 7.68%
2 Citi 20,709.67 133 7.40%
3 JPMorgan 13,802.40 85 4.93%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 12,328.25 77 4.40%
5 Goldman Sachs 11,208.75 54 4.00%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalRMB awards: Most impressive issuers, best law firm

    In this third part of the GlobalRMB awards, we present our reasons for choosing the best issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories — and praise the strong performance of one well-known foreign law firm.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Person of the year, most impressive innovation

    In the final article on our GlobalRMB awards, we talk about the key innovation of the year and highlight the individual that has made the greatest contribution to the development of China’s cross-border capital markets.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Best bank for securities services

    Securities services was one of the most competitive award categories GlobalRMB had to decide this year. Our awards criteria demanded the near-impossible from participating banks: to beat the competition in the fast-changing China access scheme, while at the same time demonstrating a broad client base and the ability to be at the cutting edge of innovation.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Best for ABS, CNH, G3 and Panda bonds

    In GlobalRMB's Best Bank Awards for China DCM, Standard Chartered wins for ABS and CNH, HSBC takes home the G3 Bond House Award, and Bank of China gets kudos as the Best House for Panda bond issuers.

  • Now open! GlobalCapital Asia Capital Market Awards 2018

    GlobalCapital Asia is pleased to invite pitches for our annual capital markets and investment banking awards, rewarding the most impressive transactions and investment banks of 2018.