Crazy rich Asian (primary markets)

For all the talk of a deluge of tech IPOs soon hitting the Asian (and especially Hong Kong) markets, the performance of new listings and investor appetite there both remain decidedly subdued, writes Clawback columnist Philippe Espinasse.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 11 Jun 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Since the start of 2018, IPOs in Asia have been clocking in at around $2.8bn per month, only about half the run rate of 2017. Excluding Mainland China and Japan, most of these have, as usual, taken place in Hong Kong. Between the main board and the growth-enterprise market (GEM), some 90 new listings were completed in Hong Kong alone between January and June 11.

The performance of these deals, however, is another story altogether. As of the same date, 55 of them were trading below their IPO prices, sometimes in spite of significant levels of oversubscription by both retail and institutional investors.

Ping An Healthcare and Technology’s (also known as Good Doctor) $1bn IPO is perhaps a case in point. Even though its retail offering was 654 time subscribed, with the institutional offering very “significantly oversubscribed” (according to a filing made with the exchange), it only opened up 4.6% on 4 May, despite material allocations of stock to the likes of JF Asset Management, UBS Asset Management and China Asset Management, and a rare tranche of 10 cornerstone investors (among which BlackRock, Capital Research and GIC) together chipping in for more than half of the IPO amount.

The share price subsequently closed flat on that same day, before tumbling 11% only a few days later, actually posting the worst performance by a technology company on Hong Kong’s main board since 2014. As of June 11, Good Doctor was trading just above water. Maybe not what the Good Doctor expected.

For sure, the Asian (and other) markets have experienced significant volatility of late. While the VIX volatility index has somewhat recovered from its massive spike of last February, it is still hovering at levels significantly above those seen throughout 2017.

But for most IPO issuers, the lack of performance of their deals probably points to an obvious lack of quality in their books of demand, leading in turn to little or no sustained buying and support for these counters in the aftermarket.

One of the main reasons can probably be found in the analysis of net flows into Asian markets. Because of the ongoing emerging market rout, foreign investors were consistent sellers of Asian stocks — for a solid 10 weeks to the end of May.

While most central banks globally have been maintaining interest rates in light of the market’s instability, the net selling by international institutions has also been dampened by expectations of rate hikes in the US, as well as the strengthening of the dollar against Asian currencies (with the notable exceptions of the yuan, Thai baht and Malaysian ringgit).

In spite of all that, the IPO pipeline remains rather healthy, with about 150 IPOs currently under execution in North Asia alone, not all of which will of course ultimately make it to pricing.

As usual, South and Southeast Asia remain the poor relation of ECM desks, even though a few billion, or even in some cases, multi-billion, dollar deals could bring some level of excitement in the second half. These include offerings by Archi Indonesia; Edra Power, Great Eastern and Prudential in Malaysia; and the ever-present IPOs of the National Stock Exchange and Vodafone, as well as a few real estate investment trusts in India.

Plenty to look forward to, then, provided that pricing expectations remain sensible, but, as the recent trade negotiation just showed in Canada, it could all be over on the back of a single tweet.

Philippe Espinasse was a capital markets banker for almost 20 years and is now an independent consultant in Hong Kong. He is the author of “IPO: A Global Guide”, “IPO Banks: Pitch, Selection and Mandate”, and of the Hong Kong thrillers “Hard Underwriting” and “The Traveler”. His new book, “Cornerstone Investors: A practice Guide for Asian IPOs” was published in January 2018.

  • By GlobalCapital
  • 11 Jun 2018

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 China Merchants Securities Co 20.18
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 14.26
3 CITIC Securities 12.06
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 10.97
5 China CITIC Bank Corp 9.87

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 13,871.99 57 8.10%
2 Citi 11,327.61 67 6.61%
3 Morgan Stanley 11,205.74 46 6.54%
4 China International Capital Corp Ltd 9,165.84 31 5.35%
5 China Securities Co Ltd 8,445.39 35 4.93%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 17,477.67 143 7.61%
2 Citi 15,770.34 102 6.87%
3 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 11,217.92 67 4.89%
4 JPMorgan 10,857.58 61 4.73%
5 Goldman Sachs 9,731.81 44 4.24%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital SRI Awards 2018: the nominations

    The nominations for GlobalCapital's Sustainable and Responsible Capital Markets Awards 2018 have been revealed, as a result of our worldwide market poll, conducted in July.

  • GlobalCapital opens Green/SRI Bond and Loan Awards Poll 2018

    After a year of burgeoning growth and change in green, social and sustainability bond issuance, with huge acceleration in green loans, GlobalCapital today invites you to vote in its third Awards poll for this market.

  • The Australian Fixed Income Poll 2018

    Asiamoney, in association with National Australia Bank, invites all fixed income investors in Asia and Europe to participate in the Australian Fixed Income Poll 2018. The online poll will take only five to 10 minutes to complete.

  • Regional Capital Markets Awards Part IV: Investment Bank

    In the last instalment of our 2017 awards, we present the full write-ups of the winners of Best Asian Investment Bank and Best Investment Bank.

  • Regional Capital Markets Awards Part III: Bonds

    In the third instalment of our 2017 awards, we present the full write-ups of the winners of the Best Local Currency Bond, Best High Yield Bond, Best Financial Bond, Best SSA Bond, Best Investment Grade Bond, Best Project Finance Deal, Best Bond, Best G3 and Local Currency Bond House, and Best High Yield Bond House.