STS is burden enough without shoehorning in ESG criteria

© 2025 GlobalCapital, Derivia Intelligence Limited, company number 15235970, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX. Part of the Delinian group. All rights reserved.

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement | Event Participant Terms & Conditions

STS is burden enough without shoehorning in ESG criteria

Shoe_Horn_AdobeStock_575x375_20Feb20
Men's luxury shoes from woven leather and a spoon for shoes. | fortton - stock.adobe.com

With the environmental, social and governance revolution well under way, attention has turned to the securitization market after recent deals pushed the issue to the top of the agenda. There has been talk of retrofitting the ‘simple, transparent and standardised’ (STS) regulatory framework with a ‘green’ or ‘ESG’ category, but regulators should think twice before conflating both themes.

Unlock this article.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this article:

Request a Free Trial or Login
Gift this article