Moody’s ‘arbitrary’ criteria weaken purpose of corporate hybrids

The latest pronouncement by Moody’s on how it proposes to treat corporate hybrids has thrown up a barrage of questions for those issuers on the cusp of speculative grade. In a special feature, EuroWeek’s Jon Hay analyses what lies in store.

  • By Stefanie Linhardt
  • 08 Aug 2013

A methodology announcement by Moody’s last week highlights the paradoxical nature of the burgeoning corporate hybrid capital market — and its potential fragility. The agency’s stance could increase the risk of a company falling off a ratings cliff, just at the moment when it loses investment grade ratings.


Please take a trial or subscribe to access this content.

Contact our subscriptions team to discuss your access:

Corporate access

To discuss GlobalCapital access for your entire department or company please contact our subscriptions sales team at: or find out more online here.

GlobalCapital European securitization league table

Rank Lead Manager/Arranger Total Volume $m No. of Deals Share % by Volume
1 Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAML) 4,755 19 11.75
2 Citi 4,288 14 10.60
3 Rabobank 2,633 4 6.51
4 Goldman Sachs 2,615 4 6.46
5 Barclays 2,603 8 6.43

Bookrunners of Global Structured Finance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 74,266.46 209 13.33%
2 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 64,298.92 202 11.54%
3 Wells Fargo Securities 55,583.74 178 9.98%
4 JPMorgan 40,447.01 140 7.26%
5 Credit Suisse 30,239.23 97 5.43%