Moody’s ‘arbitrary’ criteria weaken purpose of corporate hybrids

The latest pronouncement by Moody’s on how it proposes to treat corporate hybrids has thrown up a barrage of questions for those issuers on the cusp of speculative grade. In a special feature, EuroWeek’s Jon Hay analyses what lies in store.

  • By Stefanie Linhardt
  • 08 Aug 2013

A methodology announcement by Moody’s last week highlights the paradoxical nature of the burgeoning corporate hybrid capital market — and its potential fragility. The agency’s stance could increase the risk of a company falling off a ratings cliff, just at the moment when it loses investment grade ratings.


Please take a trial or subscribe to access this content.

Contact Mark Goodes to discuss your access:

Corporate access

To discuss GlobalCapital access for your entire department or company please contact our subscriptions sales team at: or find out more online here.

GlobalCapital European securitization league table

Rank Lead Manager/Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Societe Generale 15.35
2 Rabobank 14.41
3 Morgan Stanley 11.73
4 Barclays 8.99
5 Credit Agricole 7.57

Bookrunners of Global Structured Finance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 27 Feb 2017
1 Wells Fargo Securities 11,897.40 33 11.83%
2 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 9,837.56 29 9.78%
3 Citi 9,714.54 32 9.66%
4 JPMorgan 7,997.38 24 7.95%
5 Credit Suisse 6,335.67 14 6.30%