Austerity still high on policy agenda
GlobalMarkets, is part of the Delinian Group, DELINIAN (GLOBALCAPITAL) LIMITED, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 15236213
Copyright © DELINIAN (GLOBALCAPITAL) LIMITED and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Emerging Markets

Austerity still high on policy agenda

lagarde-schauble-rtr391q4-250.jpg

Fiscal adjustment should be a marathon, not a sprint, Christine Lagarde warns

IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde and German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schauble played down reports of a dispute over austerity on Friday.

Lagarde denied she had switched from advocating spending cuts to less painful approaches.

Fiscal adjustment of the kind being applied in the eurozone must be seen as a “marathon and not a sprint,” Lagarde said after Schauble’s comments on Thursday that she had contradicted the IMF’s earlier pro-austerity stance.

“We have said all along that adjustment is necessary but it is a matter of pace,” Lagarde said in a debate on the sidelines of the annual IMF meeting in Tokyo. “We have not changed our line at all.”

Sticking firmly to the hard-line policies he has consistently advocated in dealing with high levels of government debt, Schauble repeated during the debate that “there is no progress without pain” and that “there is no alternative” to austerity.

“You need a stable fiscal situation in order to ensure growth,” said Schauble. “There is no alternative to reducing too high spending” in order to achieve this, he said, adding that politicians “have to make hard decisions.”

Schauble argued repeatedly that “increasing public debt does not increase growth,” but others taking part in the hour and a half-long debate suggested that the situation was not as gloomy as the German minister insisted.

“Medium-term [fiscal debt] consolidation makes sense,” said Citigroup Global Banking vice chairman Peter Orszag. But it should be accompanied by “short-term” stimulus, he argued, citing the case of New Zealand, which he said had applied such dual approaches successfully.

Raghuram Rajan, chief economic advisor to India’s finance ministry and a former IMF chief economist urged the adoption of a “middle way” between austerity and stimulus. “Tell people that they have to run only half a marathon” in order to avoid the kind of special protests now being seen in some eurozone countries, he said.

“Europe must confront the fact that some of its debt is unsustainable and that maybe you have to write off some of it,” added Rajan. “Pushing Greece and others beyond a certain point could create problems.”

Austerity is not for all, the panellists suggested. “The United States and the United Kingdom have no need for immediate fiscal austerity,” said Orszag while Lagarde suggested that “Portugal can afford to relax [austerity] a little” and that Greece too had “made a huge adjustment.”

In a separate briefing to journalists in Tokyo, UK Chancellor George Osborne said that the UK’s austerity measures were necessary to ensure economic stability. “If you don’t get on with structural reforms to your public finances, reducing welfare costs, reforming education, putting in place the infrastructure you need for a modern economy, then you are going to suffer,” Osborne said.

“Sadly too many Western countries seem to be ducking those challenges, we in Britain are determined not to.”

Speaking ahead of today’s meeting of the IMF’s International Monetary and Financial Committee, he said: “There is less of an immediate sense of crisis than there was for example at last year’s annual meetings but that there is a greater concern about what lurks around the corner.”

Gift this article