Liquidity Used To Mitigate Aussie Servicing Transfer Risk

An “appropriately sized” liquidity facility is important to mitigate cash-flow disruption as a result of servicing transfer in Australian securitizations, according to Moody’s Investors Service.

  • 24 Mar 2011
An “appropriately sized” liquidity facility is important to mitigate cash-flow disruption as a result of servicing transfer in Australian securitizations, according to Moody’s Investors Service. Moody’s states in a new report that such a facility should be used as a source of temporary funding, and ideally should be ...

Please take a trial or subscribe to access this content.

Contact our subscriptions team to discuss your access: subs@globalcapital.com

Corporate access

To discuss GlobalCapital access for your entire department or company please contact our subscriptions sales team at: subs@globalcapital.com or find out more online here.

GlobalCapital European securitization league table

Rank Lead Manager/Arranger Total Volume $m No. of Deals Share % by Volume
1 Citi 2,007 6 18.96
2 BNP Paribas 1,434 4 13.55
3 Goldman Sachs 1,392 3 13.15
4 Barclays 1,097 2 10.37
5 Morgan Stanley 1,094 2 10.34

Bookrunners of Global Structured Finance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 18,228.90 62 10.23%
2 JPMorgan 18,161.74 49 10.19%
3 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 16,385.65 54 9.19%
4 Wells Fargo Securities 16,128.82 45 9.05%
5 Barclays 12,632.86 43 7.09%