London Connect throws up more questions than answers

The London-Shanghai Stock Connect, slated to launch by the end of the year, has the capital market’s undivided attention given its vast potential. But bankers and industry associations want more clarity on the operational aspects of the link.

  • By Rashmi Kumar
  • 08 Oct 2018
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Following the success of the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connects, China’s regulators are keen to roll out the link to London, in what is the latest example of China’s renminbi internationalisation strategy.

But the initial blueprint of the rules, published and under public consultation since the start of September that will govern the London-Shanghai Connect, has raised more questions than provided answers.

“The [China Securities Regulatory Commission] and the [London Stock Exchange] are both consulting on the London-Shanghai Connect but the consultations currently lack the necessary details,” Eugenie Shen, head of the asset management group at Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (Asifma), told GlobalMarkets. “Besides doing public consultations, they need to work closely with the buy and sell side of the industry to iron out the operational issues of the Connect.”

Among the missing details that need sorting out are issues around fungibility, currency conversion, settlement and clearing, and other operational issues, said Shen. She pointed to the example of Chinese stocks’ settlement period of T+0 days, while the LSE settles on a T+2 cycle. Differences such as these will need to be worked out, as was done with the Shanghai and Shenzhen connects with Hong Kong, she added.

In its basic form, LSE listings by Chinese companies will be done through Global Depository Receipts (GDRs), which will be the same as the traditional GDRs except they will trade on a special section of the exchange, called the Shanghai Board. Foreign listings on the SSE will be through Chinese Depository Receipts (CDRs).

A big difference between China’s link with London versus the Hong Kong tie-ups is the usage of depositary receipts for the former, while the latter involves shares. This change means more clarity is needed around the relationship between the depositary receipts and the underlying stocks themselves and how fungible they are, say market watchers.

And then there is the question around what currencies will be used for trading GDRs. The draft rules throw little light on that, with speculation rife about dollars, pounds or renminbi being in favour. But the dollar appears to have a natural advantage.
  • By Rashmi Kumar
  • 08 Oct 2018

All International Bonds

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 13 Dec 2018
1 Citi 344,931.23 1345 8.09%
2 JPMorgan 341,263.25 1468 8.00%
3 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 306,817.51 1057 7.19%
4 Barclays 256,761.63 967 6.02%
5 Goldman Sachs 227,538.09 771 5.33%

Bookrunners of All Syndicated Loans EMEA

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 BNP Paribas 47,555.97 198 6.55%
2 JPMorgan 46,108.71 102 6.36%
3 UniCredit 39,353.09 170 5.42%
4 Credit Agricole CIB 36,680.00 183 5.06%
5 SG Corporate & Investment Banking 35,773.91 138 4.93%

Bookrunners of all EMEA ECM Issuance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 JPMorgan 14,088.48 62 8.96%
2 Goldman Sachs 13,469.15 66 8.57%
3 Citi 9,948.21 58 6.33%
4 Morgan Stanley 8,572.10 54 5.45%
5 UBS 8,391.04 36 5.34%