Wake up and smell the fintech

Hong Kong and China-based fintech lender WeLab could be a sign of things to come in the Asian syndicated loans market as the start-up seeks out its debut borrowing. Some banks will no doubt cast off the industry as a fad and give it a miss. But now is as good a time as any to take a fresh look at fintech.

  • By John Loh
  • 20 Sep 2016
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

The borrower, which operates the Wolaidai mobile lending platform in China and the WeLend online platform in Hong Kong, announced recently that it was looking to raise a $50m loan from the wholesale market in the fourth quarter via ING Bank, the proceeds of which will be used for on-lending in Hong Kong.

While banks that GlobalCapital Asia spoke with readily acknowledged the potential of fintech lending, few have been willing to put their skin in the game.

That is understandable: in Asia, funding for technology firms and start-ups has come mostly via private equity or venture capital, as many banks have a hard time getting a new age, asset light and non-traditional business past their credit committees.

But there is a good chance that the appearance of fintech names in the loan market will be no passing phase. Fintech executives predict that WeLab is only the first of what could be a slew of start-up lenders tapping bank financing.

For traditional banks, that would mean shaking off some of their scepticism around the sector. ING Bank already has. It supplied a $25m facility to WeLab and is an equity investor in the firm. Now it is leading the planned $50m syndicated loan as mandated lead arranger and bookrunner.

There is no denying that fintech can ring all kinds of alarm bells for banks. The news about Ezubao going bust earlier this year is certainly no help — it was once China's biggest peer-to-peer lender but folded after it was alleged to be a Ponzi scheme that duped close to a million retail investors in the country.

Since then, China's banking regulator has clamped down hard on peer-to-peer lenders. But rather than being spooked, it is important to take note of the fact that a number of fintech companies, like WeLab, do not operate on a peer-to-peer platform.

Of course, due diligence must run its course and lenders should look at the structure of deals carefully. Some structures provide more security than others — a senior secured deal, in the case of WeLab, offers the highest level of security in the capital structure, and its loan is secured by accounts receivable. Not all transactions will offer such security, so banks must do their homework on the underlying assets.

But getting into the sector now means that banks will get an inside look into how fintechs are run, and a chance to work with — not against — what is shaping up to be a disruptive force in banking.

Moreover, it is an opportunity for banks to put these start-ups’ much-touted loan growth, asset quality and default rates under the microscope, and see for themselves whether fintech is all it is cracked up to be.

After all, as commodities and other sectors come under pressure, the fast-growing fintech industry could prove a useful one to allocate funds to. There is no point in complaining about how too much money is chasing too few assets and how sparse the market has been for new loan launches if an emerging opportunity is ignored.

While there will no doubt be more fintech fallouts until the sector reaches maturity, it is here to stay. Coming in early will give banks better access to the rewards — as well as the risks. 

  • By John Loh
  • 20 Sep 2016

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 35.00
2 China CITIC Bank Corp 30.00
3 China Merchants Securities Co 17.00
4 HSBC 5.00
4 Standard Chartered Bank 5.00

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 5,036.26 10 12.18%
2 Huatai Securities Co Ltd 3,404.45 12 8.24%
3 CITIC Securities 2,314.61 9 5.60%
4 Citi 2,301.31 15 5.57%
5 China Securities Co Ltd 2,132.04 8 5.16%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 3,946.69 35 6.97%
2 Goldman Sachs 3,534.62 11 6.25%
3 Citi 3,319.98 22 5.87%
4 JPMorgan 3,233.64 13 5.71%
5 Credit Suisse 2,738.65 15 4.84%

Asian polls & awards

  • Regional Capital Markets Awards Part IV: Investment Bank

    In the last instalment of our 2017 awards, we present the full write-ups of the winners of Best Asian Investment Bank and Best Investment Bank.

  • Regional Capital Markets Awards Part III: Bonds

    In the third instalment of our 2017 awards, we present the full write-ups of the winners of the Best Local Currency Bond, Best High Yield Bond, Best Financial Bond, Best SSA Bond, Best Investment Grade Bond, Best Project Finance Deal, Best Bond, Best G3 and Local Currency Bond House, and Best High Yield Bond House.

  • Regional Capital Markets Awards Part II: Equities

    In the second instalment of our 2017 awards, we present the full write-ups of the winners for Best Follow-On/Accelerated Bookbuild, Best Equity-Linked Deal, Best IPO, Best ECM Deal and Best ECM House.

  • Regional Capital Markets Awards Part I: Loans

    In the first instalment of our 2017 awards, we present the full write-ups of the winners for Best Investment Grade Syndicated Loan, Best High Yield Syndicated Loan, Best Leveraged/Acquisition Finance, Best Loan and Best Loans House.

  • GlobalCapital Asia regional capital markets awards 2017: the winners

    Over the last two months, GlobalCapital Asia's team has conducted pitch meetings with banks to decide the most impressive capital markets transactions and advisers in Asia in 2017.