Deals with a difference should be the story of Asian loans

Astra Sedaya Finance has injected some excitement into what has so far been a lukewarm period for the Asian loan market by dividing up syndication for its $330m fundraising by geography. The fresh approach bodes well for its success and will also give the market a much needed shake-up.

  • By Lorraine Cushnie
  • 19 Feb 2014
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

There’s a twist to a new $330m deal from Astra Sedaya Financing (ASF) that has launched into syndication via 11 bookrunners. The Indonesian consumer financing, car and motorcycle leasing company has allotted specific target markets to each of the leads rather than opt for the normal free-for-all. 

Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi-UFJ, Mizuho Bank and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp are focusing on Japan, and Korea Development Bank on South Korea. Citi, CTBC Financial Holding and Royal Bank of Scotland are targeting Taiwan, while CIMB, DBS, Maybank and United Overseas Bank are focusing on other Asian markets.

While not without precedent, ASF’s approach is still fairly novel in the Asian loans world. Sister company Federal International Finance (FIF) made waves at the end of last year when it used the same method to syndicate its $550m loan. And bankers unused to this strategy had plenty of concerns at the time.

Not only was there fear that competition among the leads would be counter-productive to the deal’s success, but bankers were also worried about ending up holding too much on their books if they didn’t manage to sell down enough.

Ultimately their fears proved to be unfounded. And this time around, bankers are singing praises about the structure, which comes with some enhancements. One key difference between the deals for FIF and ASF is that the latter is not being underwritten by the leads. Each of the 11 has committed a firm $30m, and they are looking to simply raise more in syndication to trigger the greenshoe option. They are hoping to hit a $500m target.

Good omens

Not taking on underwriting risk certainly eases the challenge of syndication. Add to that the divvying up of distribution responsibilities and the transaction bodes well for the borrower and for the wider loan market.

For starters, having to focus on a particular market means the leads will have to consider a broader range of lenders. One stand-out feature of FIF’s outcome was the participation of Japanese leasing companies — names not typically seen in syndication.

With three banks concentrating on Japan to raise demand for ASF, it is highly likely the diversity of lenders will increase.

And diversity in names could make or break this deal. ASF’s transaction comes at a time when Taiwanese banks’ involvement in loans is faltering, stemming from a rise in funding costs, lack of profits on thinly-priced deals, and excess exposure already to various credits. Their presence in new transactions is expected to be subdued, meaning that hunting out fresh names could become a critical factor in the success of deals across the board.

Moreover, in a market dominated by clubs and plain-vanilla deals, and at a time when loan volumes are sliding and the pipeline looks thin, it is essential that banks — and borrowers — start thinking creatively.

Tried and tested approaches are obviously comforting and effective for borrowers and bookrunners, and whether more issuers will follow in the footsteps of FIF and ASF is difficult to say. But when faced with competition from other capital market options, and a visible lack of supply, a different take on loan strategies can do wonders for issuers. It could even revitalise the syndicated loan market. 

  • By Lorraine Cushnie
  • 19 Feb 2014

Panda Bonds Top Arrangers

Rank Arranger Share % by Volume
1 China Merchants Securities Co 15.31
2 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) 12.35
3 CITIC Securities 8.92
4 Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) 7.60
5 China CITIC Bank Corp 6.76

Bookrunners of Asia-Pac (ex-Japan) ECM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 17,554.09 85 7.61%
2 Morgan Stanley 14,624.46 73 6.34%
3 Citi 14,337.79 96 6.22%
4 UBS 13,054.43 87 5.66%
5 China International Capital Corp Ltd 11,355.46 47 4.93%

Bookrunners of Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) G3 DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 HSBC 25,609.89 222 7.63%
2 Citi 23,801.57 158 7.09%
3 JPMorgan 15,663.09 97 4.66%
4 Goldman Sachs 13,751.52 67 4.09%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 13,613.92 86 4.05%

Asian polls & awards

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Bonds

    In part three of our results announcements, we reveal the winning bond deals across a variety of categories. In addition, we also name the Best G3 Bond House, Best Local Currency Bond House, Best High Yield Bond House and the debut winner of the Best House for SRI Financing.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Equities

    In part two of our results announcements, we reveal the winning equity deals and banks, including the Best Follow-on/Accelerated Bookbuild, Best Equity-Linked Deal, Best IPO, Best ECM Deal and Best ECM House.

  • GlobalCapital Asia capital markets awards 2018: Loans

    GlobalCapital Asia has spent the last two months talking to banks and their clients in a bid to determine the most impressive capital markets transactions and advisers across Asia ex-Japan in 2018. We are pleased to begin our awards announcements in the loan market.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Most impressive issuers, best law firm

    In this third part of the GlobalRMB awards, we present our reasons for choosing the best issuers in the FIG, corporate and SSA categories — and praise the strong performance of one well-known foreign law firm.

  • GlobalRMB awards: Person of the year, most impressive innovation

    In the final article on our GlobalRMB awards, we talk about the key innovation of the year and highlight the individual that has made the greatest contribution to the development of China’s cross-border capital markets.