Reform To Hit Close-Out Netting

Close-out netting under International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements could become less effective once regulatory reform forces companies to separate various types of derivative activity.

  • 16 Jul 2010

--Eleni Himaras

 Robert Pickel, ISDA

 Robert Pickel
Close-out netting under International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements could become less effective once regulatory reform forces companies to separate various types of derivative activity.

Once dealers are forced to separate over-the-counter derivatives, cleared derivatives, exchange-traded derivatives, and those spun-off ...

Please take a trial or subscribe to access this content.

Contact our subscriptions team to discuss your access: subs@globalcapital.com

Corporate access

To discuss GlobalCapital access for your entire department or company please contact our subscriptions sales team at: subs@globalcapital.com or find out more online here.

All International Bonds

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 242,385.66 930 8.17%
2 JPMorgan 224,331.47 1001 7.56%
3 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 216,781.07 727 7.31%
4 Barclays 185,859.78 675 6.27%
5 Goldman Sachs 160,296.83 522 5.40%

Bookrunners of All Syndicated Loans EMEA

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 JPMorgan 32,522.19 61 6.53%
2 BNP Paribas 32,284.10 130 6.48%
3 UniCredit 26,992.47 123 5.42%
4 SG Corporate & Investment Banking 26,569.73 97 5.33%
5 Credit Agricole CIB 23,807.36 111 4.78%

Bookrunners of all EMEA ECM Issuance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Goldman Sachs 10,167.68 46 8.79%
2 JPMorgan 9,894.90 42 8.55%
3 Citi 8,202.25 45 7.09%
4 UBS 6,098.17 23 5.27%
5 Credit Suisse 5,236.02 28 4.53%