Watermark
Go to Asia edition

CLOs, CEFs Offer Structural Trade-Offs For Investors

There are advantages and disadvantages of using collateralized loan obligations and leveraged loan closed-end funds as investment vehicles for leveraged loan managers, as well as senior and junior investors, according to Fitch Ratings.

  • 02 May 2011
There are advantages and disadvantages of using collateralized loan obligations and leveraged loan closed-end funds as investment vehicles for leveraged loan managers, as well as senior and junior investors, according to Fitch Ratings. A new Fitch report analyzes the performance of the various classes of CLOs and CEFs ...

Please take a trial or subscribe to access this content.

Contact our subscriptions team to discuss your access: subs@globalcapital.com

Or sign up for a trial to gain full access to the entire site for a limited period.

Free Trial
Log in

Corporate access

To discuss GlobalCapital access for your entire department or company please contact our subscriptions sales team at: subs@globalcapital.com or find out more online here.

GlobalCapital European securitization league table

Rank Lead Manager/Arranger Total Volume $m No. of Deals Share % by Volume
View full table
1 BNP Paribas 5,997 17 15.40
2 Citi 4,679 16 12.02
3 Lloyds Bank 3,158 6 8.11
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAML) 3,104 10 7.97
5 Morgan Stanley 3,066 8 7.88

Bookrunners of Global Structured Finance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
View full table
For detailed analysis: Dealogic
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 70,707.91 236 10.46%
2 JPMorgan 64,579.62 197 9.55%
3 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 51,474.08 169 7.61%
4 Wells Fargo Securities 51,322.59 157 7.59%
5 Credit Suisse 47,737.24 151 7.06%