Banks in Philippines cap NDF exposures, says Nomura

Onshore banks in the Philippines are understood to have capped their exposure to non-deliverable forwards across the board. The move may be linked with the central bank’s distaste for onshore banks large arbitrage activity between forwards and NDFs.

  • 10 Mar 2011
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Banks based in the Philippines are understood to have agreed informally to cap their non-deliverable forward (NDF) positions, according to Nomura FX strategists. The initiative became live on March 4.

Reasons for this move, which could not be immediately corroborated, may be linked with the Bangko Sentral Ng Pilipinas (BSP) desire to contain the selling of US dollar for pesos onshore, placing upward pressure on the country’s currency.

The move may also have something to do with BSP’s concern over the large FX arbitrage positions onshore banks have. Arbitrage occurs because banks can take a positive carry from selling onshore forward and buying offshore US$/PHP NDFs that are deliverable in US dollars.

Nomura said the informal agreement amongst onshore banks has already led to some unwinding of arbitrage positions.

This unwinding has caused the onshore/offshore spreads to widen, with the spread difference between the 12-month forward rate and the NDF rate gapping out to -470 basis points compared with -80 basis points on March 4, when this informal agreement is believed to have started.

As spreads widen out, arbitrage opportunities naturally become more compelling, leading to arbitrage activity picking us with banks’ net open positions that do not hit this March 4 level.

“It could also add to NDF volatility because of less arbitrage activity, which would under normal circumstances keep the onshore and offshore curves closer together,” wrote Simon Flint, head of FX strategy at Nomura.

  • 10 Mar 2011

Bookrunners of International Emerging Market DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 48,617.52 231 9.46%
2 HSBC 43,297.67 292 8.43%
3 JPMorgan 34,507.54 171 6.72%
4 Standard Chartered Bank 28,928.33 204 5.63%
5 Deutsche Bank 25,097.86 98 4.88%

Bookrunners of LatAm Emerging Market DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 13,465.23 42 17.91%
2 HSBC 8,624.00 21 11.47%
3 JPMorgan 7,888.60 35 10.49%
4 Deutsche Bank 6,487.13 9 8.63%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 4,573.34 21 6.08%

Bookrunners of CEEMEA International Bonds

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 19,041.78 65 11.42%
2 Standard Chartered Bank 15,207.37 64 9.12%
3 JPMorgan 15,111.39 63 9.06%
4 Deutsche Bank 12,722.14 33 7.63%
5 HSBC 12,613.66 56 7.56%

EMEA M&A Revenue

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 02 May 2016
1 JPMorgan 195.08 50 10.55%
2 Goldman Sachs 162.26 37 8.77%
3 Morgan Stanley 141.22 46 7.64%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 114.20 33 6.18%
5 Citi 95.36 35 5.16%

Bookrunners of Central and Eastern Europe: Loans

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 UniCredit 4,631.80 28 12.96%
2 ING 3,270.62 26 9.15%
3 Credit Agricole CIB 2,397.03 10 6.71%
4 SG Corporate & Investment Banking 2,093.15 15 5.86%
5 MUFG 1,979.59 10 5.54%

Bookrunners of India DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 AXIS Bank 6,262.97 112 23.11%
2 HDFC Bank 3,031.20 67 11.18%
3 Trust Investment Advisors 2,793.32 96 10.31%
4 AK Capital Services Ltd 1,915.50 83 7.07%
5 ICICI Bank 1,863.14 64 6.87%