ISDA returns volley on NYT OTC bashing

Derivatives lobbying group ISDA has fought back on behalf of its industry to claims made in the New York Times that derivatives were to blame for providing MF Global its hefty long exposure to European sovereign debt.

  • 08 Nov 2011
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) issued a strong response to a news article which claimed MF Global was able to gain its vast long exposure to European sovereign debt was through over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, assserting the information is wrong in substance and fact.

The New York Times (NYT) claimed MF Global, which the holding company filed for bankruptcy protection on October 31, collapsed under the weight of the derivative positions it has placed on European sovereign debt.

The NYT said on November 5 that MF Global’s failing “was a result of complex swaps deals it had struck with trading partners. While those partners owned the underlying assets — in this case, government debt — MF Global held the risk relating to both market price and default.”

ISDA said today (October 8) MF Global did not use derivatives to make its bets on European sovereign debt, rather it was repurchase loan agreements (repos)..

ISDA’s position does appear very plausible. MF Global stated in its third-quarter earnings release on October 25:

“As of September 30, 2011, MF Global maintained a net long position of US$6.3 billion in a short-duration European sovereign portfolio financed to maturity (repo-to-maturity), including Belgium, Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Ireland.”

In a withering conclusion, ISDA said, “We would have also thought that reporters (and consultants who are used as expert sources on financial matters) would know that because MF Global was an SEC registered Broker-Dealer and CFTC registered Futures Commission Merchant, regulators at all times had full transparency into the nature and extent of MF Global’s trading and risk positions.”

  • 08 Nov 2011

Bookrunners of International Emerging Market DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 44,729.57 212 9.33%
2 HSBC 41,394.01 276 8.64%
3 JPMorgan 31,756.79 160 6.63%
4 Standard Chartered Bank 27,312.31 190 5.70%
5 Deutsche Bank 24,616.33 93 5.14%

Bookrunners of LatAm Emerging Market DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 12,606.94 40 17.31%
2 HSBC 8,624.00 21 11.84%
3 JPMorgan 7,849.43 34 10.78%
4 Deutsche Bank 6,464.32 8 8.88%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 4,241.86 18 5.82%

Bookrunners of CEEMEA International Bonds

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 17,309.35 60 11.07%
2 Standard Chartered Bank 14,748.03 62 9.43%
3 JPMorgan 13,336.18 58 8.53%
4 Deutsche Bank 12,469.15 31 7.97%
5 HSBC 11,633.41 53 7.44%

EMEA M&A Revenue

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 02 May 2016
1 JPMorgan 195.08 50 10.55%
2 Goldman Sachs 162.26 37 8.77%
3 Morgan Stanley 141.22 46 7.64%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 114.20 33 6.18%
5 Citi 95.36 35 5.16%

Bookrunners of Central and Eastern Europe: Loans

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 UniCredit 4,462.38 26 13.30%
2 ING 3,123.12 24 9.31%
3 Credit Agricole CIB 2,397.03 10 7.14%
4 MUFG 1,957.67 10 5.83%
5 Credit Suisse 1,802.80 1 5.37%

Bookrunners of India DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 AXIS Bank 6,262.97 112 23.72%
2 HDFC Bank 3,031.20 67 11.48%
3 Trust Investment Advisors 2,793.32 96 10.58%
4 AK Capital Services Ltd 1,915.50 83 7.25%
5 ICICI Bank 1,863.14 64 7.06%