dcsimg
Emerging Markets

CLSA sees no change in 2010 China-US exchange rate

Regional economist Eric Fishwick explains why CLSA holds the view that the renminbi-US dollar exchange rate will remain unchanged until the end of 2010.

  • 18 Nov 2009
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

The renminbi’s appreciation from 2005 to 2008 was not only a response to the weakness of the US dollar, but formed part of a broader policy to slow an export-led economy.

The dollar is again weak, but economic conditions at the start of 2010 are very different in all other respects.

Chinese investment has grown explosively since the start of 2009, but it is only in the last quarter that capital spending has started to gain breadth with residential construction accelerating.

Investment in light industry, though returning, is at an earlier stage still. Inflation is negative and, thanks to spare capacity overseas, will remain low in 2010.

Because China’s stimulus has happened when the rest of the world is still troubled with surplus capacity, it is causing rapid swings in trade. Inflation is being kept low by virtue of rising imports.

This will continue in 2010, and because rising imports are to Chinese policy-makers much more benign than rising inflation, measures to slow growth will remain gradual.

Directed investment has already started to slow and will continue to do so, but currency appreciation, especially while exports remain weak, will be a last rather than a first solution.

And China has a long history of dealing with balance of payments surpluses through sterilised intervention. There is no reason to think 2010 will be different. On the contrary, rapid import growth means that the effort to resist currency appreciation will diminish.

Hot money inflows will also weaken as growth rates in the rest of Asia play catch-up with China. Monetising and then sterilising will be easier in 2010 than it has been in 2009.

At the very least currency appreciation will be postponed until late in 2010 when the private investment cycle has taken over from government and the surplus capacity that is keeping a lid on inflation has been fully cleared.

But by this time China will be running trade deficits, not surpluses. Our central case is that the exchange rate remains unchanged to the end of 2010.

  • 18 Nov 2009

Bookrunners of International Emerging Market DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 20 Oct 2014
1 HSBC 45,452.86 307 0.00%
2 Citi 43,253.65 214 0.00%
3 JPMorgan 37,633.32 164 0.00%
4 Deutsche Bank 31,769.17 161 0.00%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 24,070.56 131 0.00%

Bookrunners of LatAm Emerging Market DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 21 Oct 2014
1 Citi 11,936.75 53 10.74%
2 HSBC 11,252.06 44 10.12%
3 JPMorgan 11,171.33 36 10.05%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 11,029.46 41 9.92%
5 Deutsche Bank 9,109.83 32 8.20%

Bookrunners of CEEMEA International Bonds

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 21 Oct 2014
1 Citi 14,311.28 56 0.00%
2 JPMorgan 12,715.85 38 0.00%
3 HSBC 9,229.41 40 0.00%
4 Deutsche Bank 8,882.51 37 0.00%
5 Barclays 8,593.93 26 0.00%

EMEA M&A Revenue

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 20 Oct 2014
1 Goldman Sachs 337.31 112 7.73%
2 JPMorgan 312.96 103 7.17%
3 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 265.63 81 6.08%
4 Lazard 257.50 126 5.90%
5 Deutsche Bank 254.78 94 5.84%

Bookrunners of Central and Eastern Europe: Loans

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 21 Oct 2014
1 ING 1,794.39 18 7.86%
2 SG Corporate & Investment Banking 1,756.32 12 7.69%
3 UniCredit 1,732.50 13 7.59%
4 RBS 1,692.14 6 7.41%
5 Citi 1,529.52 13 6.70%

Bookrunners of India DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 22 Oct 2014
1 Standard Chartered Bank 3,393.34 33 5.02%
2 AXIS Bank 2,887.35 77 4.27%
3 HSBC 2,429.75 26 3.60%
4 Deutsche Bank 2,311.91 33 3.42%
5 ICICI Bank 2,046.44 54 3.03%