China’s junk-bond market initiative welcomed

The reported launch of China’s junk-bond market is constructive for the development of a rapidly growing asset class as the nation seeks to expand its source of financing, but some analysts remain sceptical.

  • 08 Feb 2012
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Cash-strapped small to medium-size Chinese enterprises will be able to tap into the junk-bond market by the end of the month or early March as China seeks diversify its sources of funding. This is perceived to be a general positive development for the rapidly growing bond market, but some analysts seem doubtful.

“This provides more choice for investors and also opens another financial channel for small companies,” said Frances Cheung, a Hong Kong-based credit strategist at Credit Agricole to Asiamoney PLUS in a telephone interview yesterday (February 7). “I think the [financing] need for small companies have triggered for the launch of this market soon because locally it seems more companies are facing more difficulty in securing bank loans.”

“It certainly will broaden the fund raising capacity for the debt capital market and also offer more options to local investors,” added Ju Wang, a credit strategist at Barclays Capital to Asiamoney PLUS in an email reply to questions. “I think the liberalisation of financial market is the unavoidable task on China’s calendar. [This is] to reduce reliance over bank lending and increase access to capital for riskier borrowers.”

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has met with executives at the country’s key brokerage houses and informed them it wants a market for high-yield bonds, according to China Business News, a Shanghai-based daily.

Zhou Ruanfan, a senior vice president from Pengyuan Credit Rating, was quoted by the newspaper as saying the CSRC had drafted rules for the issuance of junk bonds, which offer higher yields and more risk than investment-grade corporate bonds.

Small, unlisted firms and other qualified entities will be allowed to sell the bonds under a market-based registration system, which means regulators won't examine and approve every issue, Zhou was quoted as saying.

An analyst highlighted that these rules could, however, raise concerns for the type of debt that will be approved and issued under junk-bond status. He remains sceptical and believes that a supply of junk bonds will not meet investor needs.

“It’s very difficult for anyone to issue in this kind of market,” said Zhi Ming Zhang, a Hong Kong-based head of China research at HSBC to Asiamoney in a telephone interview yesterday. “Insurance companies are not allowed to buy junk-bonds. Banks wouldn’t buy it because the size is too small and there is a lack of liquidity. So what are left are fund houses and high net worth individuals – if these people are risk takers, they will buy equities instead.”

“I think the proposed junk bond market would not have much impact on China's overall bond landscape,” said another debt-capital market analyst at a local bank. “This is because there is already ample supply of high-yield bonds in the market and investors have limited appetite for junk bonds under today's market uncertainty.”

Of the Rmb2.2 trillion (US$349 billion) in corporate debt sold in 2011, only Rmb124.1 billion or 5.6%, was issued under the supervision of the CSRC, according to central bank statistics.

  • 08 Feb 2012

Bookrunners of International Emerging Market DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 17 Oct 2016
1 Citi 38,857.97 184 9.39%
2 HSBC 38,447.58 227 9.29%
3 JPMorgan 34,744.34 142 8.40%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 28,556.15 119 6.90%
5 Deutsche Bank 18,270.77 72 4.42%

Bookrunners of LatAm Emerging Market DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 18 Oct 2016
1 JPMorgan 13,268.07 33 6.30%
2 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 11,627.56 29 5.52%
3 Citi 11,610.06 30 5.52%
4 HSBC 10,091.34 29 4.79%
5 Santander 9,533.17 25 4.53%

Bookrunners of CEEMEA International Bonds

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 18 Oct 2016
1 Citi 13,617.40 57 11.05%
2 JPMorgan 12,607.77 55 10.23%
3 HSBC 9,327.72 50 7.57%
4 Barclays 8,643.78 30 7.02%
5 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 6,561.15 18 5.32%

EMEA M&A Revenue

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 02 May 2016
1 JPMorgan 195.08 50 10.55%
2 Goldman Sachs 162.26 37 8.77%
3 Morgan Stanley 141.22 46 7.64%
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 114.20 33 6.18%
5 Citi 95.36 35 5.16%

Bookrunners of Central and Eastern Europe: Loans

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 18 Oct 2016
1 UniCredit 3,966.12 27 13.01%
2 SG Corporate & Investment Banking 2,805.90 16 9.20%
3 ING 2,549.27 20 8.36%
4 Citi 2,526.98 15 8.29%
5 HSBC 1,663.71 16 5.46%

Bookrunners of India DCM

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 19 Oct 2016
1 AXIS Bank 5,944.45 123 18.53%
2 HDFC Bank 3,792.05 100 11.82%
3 Trust Investment Advisors 3,390.86 145 10.57%
4 Standard Chartered Bank 2,299.63 31 7.17%
5 ICICI Bank 1,894.86 51 5.91%