True sale confusion could put brakes on CMBS

A clash over the accounting treatment of risk retention notes has thrown the US CMBS market into flux, with uncertainty over the issue throwing into question the capital treatment and profitability of certain CMBS deals issued since the rule went into effect last year. David Bell reports.

  • By David Bell
  • 17 Aug 2017
A $625.7m deal from Ladder Capital sold in June this year — in which a horizontal risk retention piece was sold to a KKR fund — was deemed not to have met “true sale” accounting rules, according to the firm’s second-quarter results. This meant the issuer could not ...

Please take a trial or subscribe to access this content.

Contact our subscriptions team to discuss your access:

Corporate access

To discuss GlobalCapital access for your entire department or company please contact our subscriptions sales team at: or find out more online here.

GlobalCapital European securitization league table

Rank Lead Manager/Arranger Total Volume $m No. of Deals Share % by Volume
1 Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAML) 4,755 19 11.75
2 Citi 4,288 14 10.60
3 Rabobank 2,633 4 6.51
4 Goldman Sachs 2,615 4 6.46
5 Barclays 2,603 8 6.43

Bookrunners of Global Structured Finance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • Today
1 Citi 83,931.01 244 12.94%
2 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 71,587.85 220 11.03%
3 Wells Fargo Securities 64,351.96 203 9.92%
4 JPMorgan 46,391.25 147 7.15%
5 Credit Suisse 37,323.31 115 5.75%