Banner

Three approaches to funding for European SMEs

Since the global crisis, plenty has been written about banks paring back their lending activities and more stringent capital adequacy rules limiting funding opportunities, particularly for higher-risk borrowers such as smaller companies.

  • By Commerzbank AG
  • 27 Feb 2017
Email a colleague
Request a PDF

Commerz400x300


This is certainly true for bilateral lending. A study by economists Joseph Noss (Bank of England) and Priscilla Toffano (IMF) from April 2014 presents empirical evidence suggesting that an increase in capital requirements by one percentage point forces banks to cut their total lending in the short run by 1.2% to 4.5% or reduce credit growth by 1.2 to 4.6 percentage points. At the same time, though, the institutional need for income streams, ultra-accommodative monetary policy and the European Commission’s agenda to mobilize more sources of funding for European enterprise mean that sources of liquidity available to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) across Europe are healthier than they have been for many years.

Here, three Commerzbank business heads assess prospects for three core forms of SME funding and how each can be employed to achieve the optimal funding mix.

160x186_Reinhard Haas
1. Staying safe in a borrower’s market 
– Reinhard Haas, managing director, head, DCM loans

As bond yields turn negative and investors continue to search for yield, some areas of Europe’s syndicated loans market are booming. Issuance of Schuldschein – the German-originated private debt instrument characterized by its simple documentation – has grown by 50% in the past five years, according to research by Commerzbank, and is now available in at least a dozen countries across Europe.

Alongside a growing pan-European debt funds market, alternative sources of funding are coming directly from institutional investors such as insurers and pension funds. We are also seeing the emergence of the French Placement Privé Européen (European Corporate Private Placement), a cross-over product that addresses higher-risk entities while still offering attractive terms. The investor market for the product has so far been limited to French insurers. But a strong appetite among French banks and the French government to expand its use could lead distribution to open up to a far wider audience. 

Securing funding
The range of funding opportunities on the syndicated loans market for SMEs is increasingly diverse. But this comes with its own risks as new entrants look to capture market share. Conversely, some SMEs can find themselves struggling to secure financing because they fail to fit with investors’ or lenders’ expectations. 

I outline below some factors that are key to SMEs achieving fair and realistic financing terms in the syndicated loans market:

Understand what investors are looking for – Many companies, particularly in the export-focused German, Scandinavian and Dutch markets, are highly global in their outlook, not only for business opportunities but also for their funding. But those European SMEs that have remained steadfastly regional might find that they are less appealing to potential investors and lenders, both in terms of their risk profile and competitiveness. Likewise, family-owned businesses are often unused to the level of transparency and communication that investors will expect before they invest.

Being able to provide up-to-date figures and reporting and a clear picture of the company’s strategy and reason for seeking funding will help an SME access a wider pool of funding opportunities and, potentially, lower the cost of financing.

Be realistic about how long funding is required – As a rule, the longer the tenor, the more demanding the terms of a financing agreement are likely to be. It can be reassuring to lock down funding for 10 years or more. But unless you believe interest rates are going to be a lot higher in the medium to long term, or you are going to find funding harder in the future for some reason, a shorter tenor will tend to give your company more freedom and be cheaper. Likewise, if you know your company is a higher risk, the pricing and terms you are offered should reflect that. If they don’t, you should think carefully about it. Any product attempting to offer terms that are substantially out of line with the rest of the market will not be sustainable.

Seek out funding that is attractive, but also reliable investors – In a buoyant financing environment, borrowers need to be alert to new entrants offering aggressively priced financing, only to retreat sharply from the market when macroeconomic conditions move against them – a trend that has been evident in many European markets during the years following the financial crisis. If reliable, long-term or recurrent funding is a priority, aim to do business with those banks that have a properly resourced, long-term presence in your market, and a solid track record of supporting smaller enterprises throughout the market cycle.

Outlook for syndicated loans pricing

Plenty of factors are set to heighten event risks across markets. But the European Central Bank is unlikely to make any drastic changes to its monetary policy in the short term. So we don’t envisage any sharp change in pricing, or any decline in investor appetite for opportunities to lend. 

Indeed, lending to European SMEs could be the single-strongest growth area for debt capital markets over the next few years as international banks seek greater penetration into this still largely untapped market. 

For SMEs seeking competitive funding, that is good news. But prudent appraisal of the opportunities on offer will remain essential.

Moore Eoin 160x1862. Complementary funding for asset financing 
– Eoin Moore, managing director, structured asset solutions team 

Lease financing, alongside bank lending, has long been a complementary source of funding for SME capital expenditure requirements. However, in recent years, leasing appears to have been becoming an increasingly important financing source.

Research undertaken by Oxford Economics in July 2015 indicated that over 50% of European SMEs surveyed had used leasing, up from approximately 40% in 2010. 

A key factor in the increased use of leasing is that it remained a reliable source of financing in the years following the financial crisis. Although availability of bank lending has now improved substantially, evidence indicates that SMEs increasingly see the value in diversifying their sources of finance. 

Attractions of leasing
Leasing is a valuable component of the financing mix for a company of any size. However, it offers particular appeal for smaller companies in need of financing and cashflow flexibility as they seek to expand their businesses. Some of the key advantages for SMEs include:

Availability – Underlying asset security means lessors can provide funding to companies when other lenders might not be able to, or provide financing on more attractive terms than other lenders. This is particularly relevant for SMEs, which often have limited credit history. In addition, leasing can be used to finance most assets and has a high degree of flexibility in terms of deal size, with possible transaction values as low as €1,000.

Optimization of cash flow and working capital – Leasing provides funding for 100% of the acquisition cost of assets. Borrowers then repay the financing over the life of the asset, which can be funded by revenues generated by the equipment. This provides smaller companies with increased capacity to undertake the investment needed to drive the future growth of their business.

Security of funding – As longer-term committed funding, leasing is often viewed by SMEs as a more secure source of finance for their investment needs than overdrafts or bank facilities that might have a shorter term. 

Transfer of asset risk – Operating leases and contract hire provide a cost-effective solution for SMEs that require the use of an asset for a period shorter than its useful life, removing concerns of asset ownership. Additional services such as maintenance and insurance can be included, covering all of a company’s asset-related needs, which can be very attractive for smaller businesses. 

Accessing leasing 
SMEs can access leasing via the vendor channel, the branch network of banks and lessors, or through a broker. Banks remain the key providers of lease financing to SMEs, either directly or via the vendor channel. However, independent leasing companies are playing an increasingly important role in the SME market. Alongside improved financing conditions for these lessors in recent years, this is further increasing the leasing options available to smaller businesses and enabling strong growth in this market. As an example, Commerzbank has recently provided structured financing facilities to a number of independent lessors in the UK that has enabled these companies to accelerate the expansion of their lease portfolio and provide substantial incremental finance to UK SMEs.

A complement to bank lending
Leasing is not necessarily a substitute for bank lending or the loans market, but a highly flexible complement to it. By determining which assets can be acquired through leasing, a firm can make optimal use of its cashflows and reserve other funding channels for working capital and other financing requirements. The role of leasing as a highly valued financing tool for SMEs is expected to continue to grow. 

160x186 PhotoCThierolf3. M&A: a buoyant market for funding acquisition
- Christoph Thierolf, managing director, head of mergers & acquisitions  

Global merger and acquisition activity in 2016 was 20% down on 2015’s $4.3 trillion-worth of deals. However, it was still the second highest year since 2007. The bulk of this activity was at the larger end of the market. However, mid-cap and small-cap M&A activity is still in evidence as companies seek to take advantage of cash-rich balances sheets, ultra-low interest rates and access to more sources of funding.  

Financing acquisition
Smaller unlisted and unrated companies typically look to fund acquisition principally with cash. But if there’s not a sufficient surplus on the balance sheet, there are plenty of alternatives for SMEs with a strong growth story and solid cashflow projections behind their M&A plans. For example:

• Revolving credit facilities (RCFs) – Typically provided by an SME’s relationship bank, an RCF is usually offered for a five-year term. It offers the most flexibility of any funding solution and is attractive for deals where debt can be repaid fairly rapidly. RCFs are often used in combination with other types of debt such as private placements where a company wishes to stagger its debt repayments.

• Private placements – A private placement is an option for transactions of €25 million to €250 million, where capital may take seven years or more to repay. Private placements with tenors in excess of 10 years will require a financial covenant, but standard structures such as Germany’s Schuldschein model are available without that feature for better risks, keeping it very straightforward.

• European debt funds – Debt funds have been introduced as part of the EU’s Capital Markets Union (CMU) project to mobilize greater diversity of funding for European enterprise. They enable alternative investment funds (AIFs) to originate loans without the need for a banking licence. As pension funds and insurers struggle to generate the yield they need from traditional bonds, so debt funds have found a highly interested investor audience. Moreover, they can cover a range of loan assets and deal sizes, from senior to mezzanine debt, revolving credit to securitized loans.

The optimal funding solution needs to balance the potential rewards of the planned acquisition with an appropriate level of risk and debt for the acquiring company. In particular, corporates need to be mindful that any debt keeps them within the levels of gearing expected for their sector. 

A positive outlook for M&A funding

Despite heightened geopolitical risks, and the potential volatility in currencies, commodities and capital markets that could ensue, the positive environment for M&A is likely to persist in 2017 as companies shrug off continuing economic uncertainty to pursue their strategic goals. 

The M&A lifecycle is also evolving. Once it was the case that a company was expected to grow for a period before opening up its chequebook. Now, in a fast-moving digitally driven environment, the market is comfortable with even young start-ups seeking alliances at an early stage of growth – whether to enable  them to buy in innovation, offer new products, or enter new markets. This is true of traditional sectors such as engineering as much as IT or fintech, as companies across every industry look for the innovation that will help shape growth. 

For the European SME sector, the interest among investors in financing strategic acquisition is strong and is well supported by the EU’s CMU initiative. That hasn’t necessarily relieved the pressure on companies to convince the market of aggressive synergies or payback periods to justify their M&A activity. But it does mean that SMEs will continue to find plenty of funding options for imaginative, prudent and well-thought-out acquisitions. 

For more information about Commerzbank and important disclaimers https://cbcm.commerzbank.com/en/hauptnavigation/home/home.html

Disclaimer

This communication is issued by Commerzbank AG and approved in the UK by Commerzbank AG London Branch, authorised by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority and the European Central Bank. Commerzbank AG London Branch is authorised and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority.  

Copyright © Commerzbank 2016. All rights reserved.

Commerzbank AG
London Branch
30 Gresham Street
London
EC2V 7PG
Tel.: +44 20 7623 8000
Frankfurt Branch
DLZ Gebäude 2, Händlerhaus
Mainzer Landstraße 153
60327 Frankfurt am Main
Tel.: +49 69 136 44440
  • By Commerzbank AG
  • 27 Feb 2017

All International Bonds

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 13 Mar 2017
1 JPMorgan 94,925.33 384 8.39%
2 Citi 87,531.58 331 7.74%
3 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 84,341.49 288 7.46%
4 Barclays 75,288.19 241 6.66%
5 Goldman Sachs 68,504.71 208 6.06%

Bookrunners of All Syndicated Loans EMEA

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 14 Mar 2017
1 Bank of America Merrill Lynch 10,650.87 23 11.13%
2 Deutsche Bank 8,169.49 17 8.53%
3 HSBC 6,243.46 23 6.52%
4 Citi 4,355.35 13 4.55%
5 SG Corporate & Investment Banking 4,273.37 17 4.46%

Bookrunners of all EMEA ECM Issuance

Rank Lead Manager Amount $m No of issues Share %
  • Last updated
  • 18 Apr 2017
1 JPMorgan 6,719.07 26 8.43%
2 Deutsche Bank 5,994.13 30 7.52%
3 UBS 5,678.69 26 7.12%
4 Citi 4,920.31 35 6.17%
5 Goldman Sachs 4,802.16 24 6.02%